Jouffrey B, Schattschneider P, Hébert C
LMSS-Mat, CNRS-URA 850, Ecole Centrale Paris, Gde Voie des Vignes, F-92295 Châtenay-Malabry, France.
Ultramicroscopy. 2004 Dec;102(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2004.08.006.
We resolve the long-standing mysterious discrepancy between the experimental magic angle in EELS--approximately 2theta(E)--and the quantum mechanical prediction of approximately 4theta(E). A relativistic approach surpassing the usually applied kinematic correction yields a magic angle close to the experimental value. The reason is that the relativistic correction of the inelastic scattering cross section in anisotropic systems is significantly higher than in isotropic ones.