Acharya U, Small J, Randall J, Hamilton M, Templeton A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Scotland.
Fertil Steril. 1992 Apr;57(4):815-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54964-4.
To assess the usefulness of a short regimen in ovulation induction in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program.
A prospective randomized trial was set up to compare long and short regimens of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist administration for ovulation induction in IVF.
Aberdeen Assisted Reproduction Unit.
Eighty-seven patients undergoing IVF were randomized between the two protocols. Stimulation regimen was the only variable being tested.
Stimulation response and occurrence of luteinizing hormone (LH) surges.
There was no difference in the stimulation requirements, response to stimulation, number of follicles aspirated, or the number of oocytes obtained. The fertilization rates, number of embryos transferred, and pregnancy rates were also similar in both groups. Like the long regimen, it prevents the occurrence of a premature LH surge.
The short regimen is a useful and cheaper alternative in ovarian stimulation of patients undergoing IVF.
评估一种短期方案在体外受精(IVF)程序中诱导排卵的有效性。
开展一项前瞻性随机试验,比较促性腺激素释放激素激动剂给药的长方案和短方案在IVF中诱导排卵的效果。
阿伯丁辅助生殖中心。
87例接受IVF的患者被随机分配至两种方案。刺激方案是唯一被测试的变量。
刺激反应和促黄体生成素(LH)峰的出现情况。
在刺激需求、对刺激的反应、抽吸的卵泡数量或获得的卵母细胞数量方面没有差异。两组的受精率、移植的胚胎数量和妊娠率也相似。与长方案一样,它可防止过早出现LH峰。
短方案在接受IVF的患者的卵巢刺激中是一种有用且更便宜的替代方案。