Währborg Peter, Booth Jean E, Clayton Tim, Nugara Fiona, Pepper John, Weintraub William S, Sigwart Ulrich, Stables Rod H
Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Gothenburg. Sweden.
Circulation. 2004 Nov 30;110(22):3411-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148366.80443.2B. Epub 2004 Nov 22.
Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) has been associated with a range of neurological and neuropsychological complications from stroke to cognitive problems such as memory and problem solving disturbance. However, little is known about the impact of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on neuropsychological outcome.
In the Stent or Surgery Trial (SoS), 988 patients were randomized in equal proportions between PCI supported by stent implantation and CABG. As a substudy of this trial, we undertook an evaluation of neurological and neuropsychological outcomes after intervention. A clinical examination and neuropsychological assessment consisting of 5 tests (Digit Span Forwards and Backwards, Visual Reproduction, Bourdon, and Block Design) were performed at baseline and 6 and 12 months after the procedure. A total of 145 patients were included in the substudy analysis: 77 in the PCI group and 68 in the CABG group. One patient in the PCI arm had a stroke. There was no significant difference between treatment groups at 6 and 12 months for any of the 5 tests. The mean change from baseline was also similar in both groups.
We were not able to demonstrate an important and significant difference in neuropsychological outcome in patients treated with different revascularization strategies. This important finding needs to be examined in further research.
冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)与一系列神经和神经心理并发症相关,从中风到认知问题,如记忆和解决问题能力障碍。然而,关于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对神经心理结局的影响知之甚少。
在支架或手术试验(SoS)中,988例患者被等比例随机分为接受支架植入支持的PCI组和CABG组。作为该试验的一项子研究,我们对干预后的神经和神经心理结局进行了评估。在基线以及术后6个月和12个月进行了临床检查和由5项测试(数字广度顺背、视觉再现、布尔东和积木设计)组成的神经心理评估。共有145例患者纳入子研究分析:PCI组77例,CABG组68例。PCI组有1例患者发生中风。在6个月和12个月时,治疗组在这5项测试中的任何一项上均无显著差异。两组从基线的平均变化也相似。
我们未能证明采用不同血运重建策略治疗的患者在神经心理结局方面存在重要且显著的差异。这一重要发现需要在进一步研究中加以检验。