Jänne Pasi A, Baldini Elizabeth H
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Thorac Surg Clin. 2004 Nov;14(4):567-73. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2004.06.006.
The optimum therapeutic strategy for patients with localized malignant mesothelioma continues to evolve. For patients who are eligible candidates, surgical resection plays an important role. An encouraging 45% 5-year survival rate has been reported for patients with early-stage disease who undergo EPP and have the favorable features of epithelial histology and the absence of mediastinal lymph node involvement. Most patients present with more advanced disease, however, and the optimum local and systemic treatment for these patients has not been defined. No randomized trials evaluating the various surgical or adjuvant therapeutic approaches have been performed. Evaluation of treatment efficacy based on observed patterns of failure may suffer from treatment selection biases. Most studies also do not separate out the failure patterns based on the initial stage (clinical or pathologic) of the disease. Consequently, it is difficult to discern the potential impact of a given adjuvant therapy. Given these limitations, however, some consistent observations from the available data can be made. For patients who undergo P/D, local recurrence (within the surgically operated hemithorax) is the most common form of recurrence. Efforts to decrease the chance of local recurrence after P/D have included the use of intrapleural and intravenous chemotherapy, brachytherapy, and external beam radiation therapy. None of these adjuvant treatment trials was randomized, and when compared with historical controls, none of the treatments used suggested a consistent outcome benefit. After P/D, the use of radiation is limited by the potential toxicity of the underlying organs, most importantly, the intact lung. Doses required to treat mesothelioma effectively are above the doses that would lead to damage to the lung parenchyma. Cisplatin and mitomycin have been used as agents have modest activity against mesothelioma. The doses of cisplatin used may not have been optimal, although they were based on prior pharmacokinetic studies. Alternative approaches for patients who undergo P/D, such as the use of escalating doses of heated intrapleural cisplatin (given with a renal protecting agent, sodium thiosulfate, which provides the opportunity to deliver higher doses of chemotherapy), are being pursued by Sugarbaker et al. The availability of more active systemic chemotherapy agents or other intrapleural agents also may offer better therapeutic options for patients who undergo P/D. Recently, Vogelzang et al presented the findings of a large randomized study that compared cisplatin/premetrexed to cisplatin and demonstrated an improvement in response rate (41% for cisplatin/pemetrexed versus 19% for cisplatin) and median survival (12.1 versus 9.3 months, respectively; P = 0.020). Other chemotherapy regimens with encouraging activity in mesothelioma include the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine, with response rates ranging from 16% to 48%. From a review of available data, patients with mesothelioma who have undergone P/D (with or without intrapleural chemotherapy) who are evaluated at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital are offered therapy with systemic chemotherapy alone. After P/D, radiation is used only for palliative treatment. Patients who have undergone P/D are also appropriate candidates to receive chemotherapy or other novel therapeutic strategies being evaluated in clinical trials. For patients who have undergone EPP, the pattern of recurrence is predominantly a combination of local and distant failure (Table 1). The local recurrence rates, however, seem to be lower than rates seen after P/D. This observation may represent a shift of the natural history of the disease. Metastatic mesothelioma is often seen late in the course of the disease, but it may become the dominant source of disease after aggressive local surgical management. Many studies define abdominal recurrence as a site of distant recurrence, although this may represent transdiaphragmatic extension of the pleural mesothelioma. Advances in local therapy also may decrease the rate of abdominal recurrences. True distant recurrences (bone, central nervous system, contralateral hemithorax) remain less common. The lowest rate of local recurrence (13%), with a 4% local-only recurrence rate, was seen in the study by Rusch et al, who used 54 Gy hemithorax radiation as adjuvant therapy. This is the lowest rate of local recurrence after an EPP that has been reported. Baldini et al reported a 50% local recurrence rate, with a 13% local-only rate, after trimodality therapy. One possibility for the differences between these two reports is the lower dose of radiation (30.6 Gy) used in the latter study. In the study by Rusch et al, distant failures predominate, and the patients are appropriate candidates for systemic chemotherapy, which could be administered either as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Kestenholz et al currently are performing a phase II clinical trial of neoadjuvant cisplatin and gemcitabine administered for three cycles followed by EPP and adjuvant radiation therapy. A similar approach also is being pursued in an ongoing clinical trial using neoadjuvant cisplatin/pemetrexed for four cycles before EPP followed by 54 Gy of adjuvant hemithorax radiation. Alternatively, patients who have undergone EPP could be treated with adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to adjuvant radiation therapy. Currently, patients evaluated at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital who have undergone EPP are offered adjuvant chemotherapy followed by hemithorax radiation to 54 Gy in an effort to maximize local and distant control rates. Further clinical studies are needed for all patients with mesothelioma to define the optimum surgery and duration and types of adjuvant therapy. The appropriate multimodality approaches most likely will differ based on disease stage, histology, and patient performance status. intrapleural chemotheraphy treatments. These two For Patients who have undergone EPP, the pattern
局限性恶性间皮瘤患者的最佳治疗策略仍在不断发展。对于符合条件的患者,手术切除起着重要作用。据报道,接受扩大性胸膜肺切除术(EPP)且具有上皮组织学特征且无纵隔淋巴结受累等有利特征的早期疾病患者,其5年生存率令人鼓舞,为45%。然而,大多数患者就诊时疾病已处于更晚期,这些患者的最佳局部和全身治疗方法尚未明确。目前尚未进行评估各种手术或辅助治疗方法的随机试验。基于观察到的失败模式来评估治疗效果可能会受到治疗选择偏倚的影响。大多数研究也没有根据疾病的初始阶段(临床或病理)区分失败模式。因此,很难辨别特定辅助治疗的潜在影响。然而,尽管存在这些局限性,从现有数据中仍可得出一些一致的观察结果。对于接受胸膜外全肺切除术(P/D)的患者,局部复发(在手术操作的半侧胸腔内)是最常见的复发形式。为降低P/D后局部复发的几率,人们采取了多种措施,包括使用胸膜内和静脉化疗、近距离放疗以及外照射放疗。这些辅助治疗试验均未进行随机分组,与历史对照相比,所使用的任何一种治疗方法均未显示出一致的疗效优势。P/D后,放疗的应用受到潜在的基础器官毒性的限制,最重要的是对健侧肺的影响。有效治疗间皮瘤所需的剂量高于会导致肺实质损伤的剂量。顺铂和丝裂霉素已被用作对间皮瘤有适度活性的药物。所使用的顺铂剂量可能并非最佳,尽管它们是基于先前的药代动力学研究确定的。Sugarbaker等人正在探索P/D患者的替代方法,例如使用递增剂量的热灌注胸膜内顺铂(同时给予肾脏保护剂硫代硫酸钠,这使得能够给予更高剂量的化疗)。更多活性全身化疗药物或其他胸膜内药物的出现也可能为接受P/D的患者提供更好的治疗选择。最近,Vogelzang等人公布了一项大型随机研究的结果,该研究比较了顺铂/培美曲塞与顺铂,结果显示反应率有所提高(顺铂/培美曲塞为41%,顺铂为19%),中位生存期也有所延长(分别为12.1个月和9.3个月;P = 0.020)。在间皮瘤中具有令人鼓舞活性的其他化疗方案包括顺铂和吉西他滨联合使用,反应率在16%至48%之间。通过对现有数据的回顾,在 Dana Farber癌症研究所和布莱根妇女医院接受评估的间皮瘤患者,无论是否接受胸膜内化疗,在接受P/D后均仅接受全身化疗。P/D后,放疗仅用于姑息治疗。接受P/D的患者也是接受化疗或其他正在临床试验中评估的新型治疗策略的合适人选。对于接受EPP的患者,复发模式主要是局部和远处失败的组合(表1)。然而,局部复发率似乎低于P/D后的复发率。这一观察结果可能代表了疾病自然史的转变。转移性间皮瘤在疾病过程中通常较晚出现,但在积极的局部手术治疗后,它可能成为疾病的主要来源。许多研究将腹部复发定义为远处复发部位,尽管这可能代表胸膜间皮瘤的经膈肌延伸。局部治疗的进展也可能降低腹部复发率。真正的远处复发(骨、中枢神经系统、对侧半胸)仍然较少见。Rusch等人的研究中观察到局部复发率最低(13%),仅局部复发率为4%,该研究使用54 Gy半胸放疗作为辅助治疗。这是报道的EPP后最低的局部复发率。Baldini等人报道三联疗法后局部复发率为50%,仅局部复发率为13%。这两份报告结果存在差异的一个可能原因是后一项研究中使用的放疗剂量较低(30.6 Gy)。在Rusch等人的研究中,远处失败占主导,这些患者适合接受全身化疗,可作为新辅助或辅助治疗。Kestenholz等人目前正在进行一项II期临床试验,给予新辅助顺铂和吉西他滨三个周期,随后进行EPP和辅助放疗。在一项正在进行的临床试验中也采用了类似方法,在EPP前给予新辅助顺铂/培美曲塞四个周期,随后进行54 Gy的辅助半胸放疗。或者,接受EPP的患者除辅助放疗外还可接受辅助化疗。目前,在Dana Farber癌症研究所和布莱根妇女医院接受评估的接受EPP的患者,会接受辅助化疗,随后进行半胸放疗至54 Gy,以尽量提高局部和远处控制率。所有间皮瘤患者都需要进一步的临床研究来确定最佳手术方式、辅助治疗的持续时间和类型。合适的多模式治疗方法很可能因疾病分期、组织学和患者的表现状态而有所不同。胸膜内化疗治疗。对于接受EPP的患者,模式