Toyota Hiroshi
Department of Psychology, Nara University of Education, Japan.
Percept Mot Skills. 2004 Oct;99(2):536-44. doi: 10.2466/pms.99.2.536-544.
Subjects performed an orienting task involving 3 conditions followed by an unexpected free recall test. The conditions were designed to force 3 types of corrected elaborations: Generated Correction, Chosen Correction, and No Correction. In the Generated Correction condition the subjects were presented with a target word (e.g., Baby) and a bizarre sentence frame (e.g., "____drinks beer.") and asked to correct the target to a congruous word (e.g., Uncle) to make a common sentence. In the Chosen Correction condition, the subjects were presented with a target and its bizarre sentence frame and asked to choose one of the alternative congruous words (e.g., Uncle, Aunt) to make a common sentence. In the No Correction condition, the subjects were presented with a target and its bizarre sentence frame and asked to rate the congruity of each target to its sentence frame. Generated Correction led to a better performance than Chosen Correction and No Correction, but a difference between the last two correction types was not found. These results were interpreted as showing that, by generating correct information, self-corrected elaboration led to facilitation of incidental memory.
受试者完成了一项定向任务,该任务包含三种条件,随后进行了一次意外的自由回忆测试。这些条件旨在促使三种类型的校正性精细化加工:生成校正、选择校正和无校正。在生成校正条件下,向受试者呈现一个目标词(如“婴儿”)和一个奇怪的句子框架(如“____喝啤酒”),并要求他们将目标词校正为一个合适的词(如“叔叔”)以组成一个常见的句子。在选择校正条件下,向受试者呈现一个目标词及其奇怪的句子框架,并要求他们从备选的合适词(如“叔叔”“阿姨”)中选择一个以组成一个常见的句子。在无校正条件下,向受试者呈现一个目标词及其奇怪的句子框架,并要求他们对每个目标词与句子框架的契合度进行评分。生成校正比选择校正和无校正带来了更好的表现,但未发现后两种校正类型之间存在差异。这些结果被解释为表明,通过生成正确信息,自我校正的精细化加工促进了附带记忆。