• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众参与乳腺癌研究:一项分析及未来研究模型

Public involvement in breast cancer research: an analysis and model for future research.

作者信息

McCormick Sabrina, Brody Julia, Brown Phil, Polk Ruth

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2004;34(4):625-46. doi: 10.2190/HPXB-9RK8-ETVM-RVEA.

DOI:10.2190/HPXB-9RK8-ETVM-RVEA
PMID:15560426
Abstract

Public involvement in health program planning has been taking place for many years, and has provided a precedent for the emergence of public involvement in research conducted since the early 1990s. Such involvement is now widely seen in breast cancer research, due to the large public concern and major social movement activity. This article reviews current practices and general models of public involvement in research and constructs a prototype. The authors interviewed researchers, program officers, and laypeople in order to understand the obstacles, processes, and benefits. They conclude that public involvement has major ramifications for the democratization of science and the construction of knowledge by teaching lay people about science and sensitizing researchers to concerns of the public. There is growing support on the part of scientists and government agents for public involvement.

摘要

公众参与健康项目规划已经开展多年,为20世纪90年代初以来公众参与研究的出现提供了先例。由于公众的高度关注和大规模社会运动的开展,这种参与如今在乳腺癌研究中广泛可见。本文回顾了公众参与研究的当前实践和一般模式,并构建了一个原型。作者采访了研究人员、项目官员和普通民众,以了解其中的障碍、过程和益处。他们得出结论,公众参与通过向普通民众传授科学知识并使研究人员对公众关注的问题保持敏感,对科学民主化和知识构建具有重大影响。科学家和政府机构对公众参与的支持也在不断增加。

相似文献

1
Public involvement in breast cancer research: an analysis and model for future research.公众参与乳腺癌研究:一项分析及未来研究模型
Int J Health Serv. 2004;34(4):625-46. doi: 10.2190/HPXB-9RK8-ETVM-RVEA.
2
Valuing patient and public involvement in research.重视患者和公众参与研究。
Nurs Times. 2014;110(45):22-3.
3
When society meets science.
Nat Med. 2005 Oct;11(10):1040-2. doi: 10.1038/nm1005-1040.
4
Two tribes coming together: patient and public involvement in cancer research.两个群体走到一起:患者与公众参与癌症研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014 Jan;23(1):1-2. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12178.
5
An uneven spread: a review of public involvement in the National Institute of Health Research's Health Technology Assessment program.不均衡的分布:国家卫生研究院健康技术评估计划中公众参与情况的回顾。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Oct;27(4):343-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000559.
6
Practical steps to community engaged research: from inputs to outcomes.社区参与式研究的实用步骤:从投入到产出。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Winter;40(4):904-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00719.x.
7
Breast Cancer and Occupation: The Need for Action: APHA Policy Statement Number 20146, Issued November 18, 2014.乳腺癌与职业:采取行动的必要性:美国公共卫生协会政策声明第20146号,2014年11月18日发布
New Solut. 2015 Aug;25(2):242-52. doi: 10.1177/1048291115589808. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
8
Do canadian researchers and the lay public prioritize biomedical research outcomes equally? A choice experiment.加拿大研究人员和普通公众是否同样重视生物医学研究成果?一项选择实验。
Acad Med. 2013 Apr;88(4):519-26. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828577fe.
9
Breast cancer: agenda setting through activism.
Adv Pract Nurs Q. 1998 Summer;4(1):54-63.
10
Benefits and drawbacks of including consumer reviewers in the scientific merit review of breast cancer research.将消费者评审员纳入乳腺癌研究科学价值评审的利弊。
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002 Mar;11(2):119-36. doi: 10.1089/152460902753645263.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes and perceptions regarding knowledge translation and community engagement in medical research: the PERSPECT qualitative study.关于医学研究中知识转化与社区参与的态度和认知:PERSPECT定性研究
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Mar 3;23(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01306-y.
2
Patient and Public Involvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research-A Scoping Review.患者及公众参与炎症性肠病研究——一项范围综述
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 14;7(2):137-148. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwad054. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Co-development and Usability Testing of Research 101: A Patient-Oriented Research Curriculum in Child Health (PORCCH) E-Learning Module for Patients and Families.
《研究101:儿童健康患者导向研究课程(PORCCH)患者及家庭电子学习模块的联合开发与可用性测试》
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 6;10:849959. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.849959. eCollection 2022.
4
Is Co-production Just a Pipe Dream for Applied Health Research Commissioning? An Exploratory Literature Review.联合生产对于应用健康研究委托而言只是一个白日梦吗?一项探索性文献综述。
Front Sociol. 2019 Jun 24;4:50. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00050. eCollection 2019.
5
Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review.面向研究人员、患者、医疗服务提供者和决策者的健康领域以患者为导向的研究能力(PORCH):一项范围综述的结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Feb 10;6:4. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-0180-0. eCollection 2020.
6
A taxonomy of impacts on clinical and translational research from community stakeholder engagement.社区利益相关者参与对临床和转化研究的影响分类
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):731-742. doi: 10.1111/hex.12937. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
Challenging dominant breast cancer research agendas: perspectives on the outcomes of the interagency breast cancer and environment research coordinating committee.挑战主导性乳腺癌研究议程:对机构间乳腺癌与环境研究协调委员会研究结果的看法。
Environ Health. 2019 May 6;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12940-019-0479-1.
8
Needs and concerns of transgender individuals regarding interdisciplinary transgender healthcare: A non-clinical online survey.跨性别者对跨学科跨性别医疗保健的需求与关注:一项非临床在线调查。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 28;12(8):e0183014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183014. eCollection 2017.
9
Integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research - an Australian framework.将消费者参与纳入健康与医学研究——澳大利亚框架
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 10;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0171-2.
10
Case Study: Community Engagement and Clinical Trial Success: Outreach to African American Women.案例研究:社区参与与临床试验成功:针对非裔美国女性的外展活动
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Aug;8(4):388-90. doi: 10.1111/cts.12264. Epub 2015 Mar 9.