• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将消费者参与纳入健康与医学研究——澳大利亚框架

Integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research - an Australian framework.

作者信息

Miller Caroline L, Mott Kathy, Cousins Michael, Miller Stephanie, Johnson Anne, Lawson Tony, Wesselingh Steve

机构信息

South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.

School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 10;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0171-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-017-0171-2
PMID:28187772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5303288/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality practice of consumer engagement is still in its infancy in many sectors of medical research. The South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI) identified, early in its development, the opportunity to integrate evidence-driven consumer and community engagement into its operations.

PROCESS

SAHMRI partnered with Health Consumers Alliance and consumers in evidence generation. A Partnership Steering Committee of researchers and consumers was formed for the project. An iterative mixed-method qualitative process was used to generate a framework for consumer engagement. This process included a literature review followed by semi-structured interviews with experts in consumer engagement and lead medical researchers, group discussions and a consensus workshop with the Partnership Steering Committee, facilitated by Health Consumer Alliance.

OUTCOMES

The literature revealed a dearth of evidence about effective consumer engagement methodologies. Four organisational dimensions are reported to contribute to success, namely governance, infrastructure, capacity and advocacy. Key themes identified through the stakeholder interviews included sustained leadership, tangible benefits, engagement strategies should be varied, resourcing, a moral dimension, and challenges. The consensus workshop produced a framework and tangible strategies.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive examples of consumer participation in health and medical research are limited. There are few documented studies of what techniques are effective. This evidence-driven framework, developed in collaboration with consumers, is being integrated in a health and medical research institute with diverse programs of research. This framework is offered as a contribution to the evidence base around meaningful consumer engagement and as a template for other research institutions to utilise.

摘要

背景

在医学研究的许多领域,消费者参与的优质实践仍处于起步阶段。南澳大利亚健康与医学研究所(SAHMRI)在其发展早期就发现了将循证驱动的消费者和社区参与融入其运营的机会。

过程

SAHMRI与健康消费者联盟及消费者在证据生成方面展开合作。为该项目成立了一个由研究人员和消费者组成的伙伴关系指导委员会。采用了迭代式混合方法定性过程来生成消费者参与框架。这一过程包括文献综述,随后对消费者参与方面的专家和首席医学研究人员进行半结构化访谈、小组讨论以及在健康消费者联盟的协助下与伙伴关系指导委员会举行共识研讨会。

结果

文献显示缺乏关于有效消费者参与方法的证据。据报告,四个组织维度有助于取得成功,即治理、基础设施、能力和宣传。通过利益相关者访谈确定的关键主题包括持续领导力、切实利益、参与策略应多样化、资源配置、道德层面以及挑战。共识研讨会产生了一个框架和切实可行的策略。

结论

消费者参与健康和医学研究的全面实例有限。关于哪些技术有效的文献记载研究很少。这个与消费者合作开发的循证框架正在被整合到一个开展各种研究项目的健康与医学研究所。该框架是对围绕有意义的消费者参与的证据基础的贡献,也是供其他研究机构使用的模板。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e50/5303288/61f5a49361d3/12961_2017_171_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e50/5303288/61f5a49361d3/12961_2017_171_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e50/5303288/61f5a49361d3/12961_2017_171_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrating consumer engagement in health and medical research - an Australian framework.将消费者参与纳入健康与医学研究——澳大利亚框架
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 10;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0171-2.
2
Patient and public involvement in preclinical and medical research: Evaluation of an established programme in a Discovery-Based Medical Research Institute.患者和公众参与临床前和医学研究:在以发现为基础的医学研究所中评估既定计划。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13968. doi: 10.1111/hex.13968.
3
From rhetoric to reality: consumer engagement in 16 multi-stakeholder alliances.从言辞到现实:消费者参与16个多方利益相关者联盟的情况
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(12 Suppl):s403-12.
4
Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach.让消费者参与国民保健服务体系的研发议程设定:制定基于证据的方法。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Apr;8(15):1-148, III-IV. doi: 10.3310/hta8150.
5
Embedding consumer and community involvement within an established research centre: moving from general recommendations to an actionable framework.将消费者和社区参与融入现有研究中心:从一般性建议转向可操作的框架。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Oct 27;6:64. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00241-2. eCollection 2020.
6
Consumer engagement critical to success in an Australian research project: reflections from those involved.消费者参与对澳大利亚一项研究项目的成功至关重要:参与者的反思
Aust J Prim Health. 2018 Jul;24(3):197-203. doi: 10.1071/PY17107.
7
Consumer engagement in occupational therapy health-related research: A scoping review of the Australian Occupational Therapy Journal and a call to action.消费者参与职业治疗健康相关研究:澳大利亚职业治疗杂志的范围综述及行动呼吁。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2021 Apr;68(2):180-192. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12704. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
8
Enriching health research through consumer involvement--learning through atypical exemplars.通过消费者参与丰富健康研究——从非典型范例中学习。
Health Promot J Austr. 2011 Dec;22(3):196-202. doi: 10.1071/he11196.
9
The Use of Web-Based Technologies in Health Research Participation: Qualitative Study of Consumer and Researcher Experiences.基于网络技术在健康研究参与中的应用:消费者与研究者体验的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 30;20(10):e12094. doi: 10.2196/12094.
10
Integrating values and consumer involvement in guidelines with the patient at the center: article 8 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.将价值观和消费者参与融入以患者为中心的指南:COPD 指南制定中整合和协调工作的第 8 条。美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会官方研讨会报告。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):262-8. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-061ST.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumer and community involvement in paediatric intensive care research across Australia and New Zealand: a protocol for a mixed-methods environmental scan.澳大利亚和新西兰消费者及社区参与儿科重症监护研究:一项混合方法环境扫描方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 15;11(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00734-y.
2
Embedding consumer and community involvement in antenatal healthcare research: A methodological approach and perspectives of culturally and linguistically diverse women in Australia.将消费者和社区参与纳入产前保健研究:一种方法学途径及澳大利亚文化和语言多样化女性的观点
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 1;11(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00710-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.患者及服务使用者参与研究:一项系统综述与综合框架
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1151-66. doi: 10.1111/hex.12090. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
2
"Makes you proud to be black eh?": reflections on meaningful indigenous research participation.“让你为黑人感到自豪,不是吗?”:对有意义的本土研究参与的反思。
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Aug 8;11:40. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-40.
3
Enriching health research through consumer involvement--learning through atypical exemplars.
Supporting consumer engagement in health research about chronic conditions: a scoping review of evidence-based resources.
支持消费者参与慢性病健康研究:基于证据的资源的范围审查
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Apr 29;11(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00707-1.
4
Setting Primary Health and Social Care Priorities Using a Deliberative Democratic Participatory Approach.采用协商民主参与式方法确定初级卫生和社会护理优先事项。
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70173. doi: 10.1111/hex.70173.
5
Digital Home-Based Self-Monitoring System for People with Heart Failure: Protocol for Development of SmartHeart and Evaluation of Feasibility and Acceptability.心力衰竭患者的数字家庭自我监测系统:SmartHeart的开发协议及可行性与可接受性评估
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 28;14:e62964. doi: 10.2196/62964.
6
Patient and public involvement in preclinical and medical research: Evaluation of an established programme in a Discovery-Based Medical Research Institute.患者和公众参与临床前和医学研究:在以发现为基础的医学研究所中评估既定计划。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13968. doi: 10.1111/hex.13968.
7
Exploring barriers and solutions to consumer involvement in health service research using a nominal group technique.运用名义群体技术探索消费者参与卫生服务研究的障碍及解决方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jul 11;10(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00604-z.
8
Assessing early feasibility of a novel innovation to increase consumer partnership capability within an Australian health innovation organisation using a mixed-method approach.采用混合方法评估澳大利亚健康创新组织内一项新创新提高消费者合作能力的早期可行性。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 1;14(5):e080495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080495.
9
The ENJOY Seniors Exercise Park IMP-ACT project: IMProving older people's health through physical ACTivity: a hybrid II implementation design study protocol.“享受老年人运动公园IMP-ACT项目”:通过体育活动改善老年人健康:一项混合II型实施设计研究方案
Arch Public Health. 2024 Mar 26;82(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01262-z.
10
Partnering with Consumers - Why would I do it? What is it? How do I do it?与消费者合作——我为什么要这样做?它是什么?我该怎么做?
J Med Radiat Sci. 2024 Jun;71(2):170-173. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.782. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
通过消费者参与丰富健康研究——从非典型范例中学习。
Health Promot J Austr. 2011 Dec;22(3):196-202. doi: 10.1071/he11196.
4
The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review.患者和公众参与对英国国民保健制度医疗保健的影响:系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Feb;24(1):28-38. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr066. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
5
Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: a narrative review of case examples.公众参与健康和社会保健系统评价过程:案例分析叙述性综述。
Health Policy. 2011 Oct;102(2-3):105-16. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.05.002.
6
Professionals and the public: power or partnership in health research?专业人员和公众:健康研究中的权力还是伙伴关系?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):276-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01572.x. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
7
Status, challenges and facilitators of consumer involvement in Australian health and medical research.澳大利亚卫生和医学研究中消费者参与的现状、挑战和促进因素。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2010 Nov 18;8:34. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-8-34.
8
Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research.评估用户参与研究的质量和影响的批判性评价指南。
Health Expect. 2010 Dec;13(4):359-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00607.x.
9
Patient and public involvement in clinical trials.患者及公众参与临床试验。
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):903-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39547.586100.80.
10
Public involvement in breast cancer research: an analysis and model for future research.公众参与乳腺癌研究:一项分析及未来研究模型
Int J Health Serv. 2004;34(4):625-46. doi: 10.2190/HPXB-9RK8-ETVM-RVEA.