McCulloch Jock, Tweedale Geoffrey
Center for Business History, Manchester Metropolitan University Business School, United Kingdom.
Int J Health Serv. 2004;34(4):663-79. doi: 10.2190/F06D-LE93-M6LH-XJ0B.
This study documents and contrasts the development of knowledge about asbestos-related disease (ARD) in South Africa and the United Kingdom. It also contributes to the globalization debate by exploring corporate decision-making in a multinational industry. Between the 1930s and 1960s, the leading U.K. asbestos companies developed a sophisticated knowledge of ARD, though in South Africa, where the leading companies such as Turner & Newall and Cape Asbestos owned mines, there was little attempt to apply this knowledge. Asbestos mines (and their environments) in South Africa were uniquely dusty and ARD was rife. Social and political factors in South Africa, especially apartheid, allowed these companies to apply double standards, even after 1960 when the much more serious hazard of mesothelioma was identified. This shows the need for greater regulation of multinationals. Because of the lack of such regulation in the early 1960s, an opportunity was lost to prevent the current high morbidity and mortality of ARD both in South Africa and worldwide.
本研究记录并对比了南非和英国关于石棉相关疾病(ARD)的知识发展情况。它还通过探索一个跨国行业中的企业决策,为全球化辩论做出了贡献。在20世纪30年代至60年代期间,英国主要的石棉公司对ARD有了深入的了解,然而在南非,像特纳与纽沃尔公司和开普石棉公司等主要公司拥有矿山,却几乎没有尝试应用这些知识。南非的石棉矿(及其环境)尘土飞扬的情况极为特殊,ARD盛行。南非的社会和政治因素,尤其是种族隔离,使得这些公司能够采用双重标准,即使在1960年发现间皮瘤这种更为严重的危害之后也是如此。这表明需要对跨国公司进行更严格的监管。由于20世纪60年代初缺乏这种监管,失去了预防南非乃至全球目前ARD高发病率和高死亡率的机会。