Suppr超能文献

与单一蛋白酶抑制剂相比,非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂具有更高的病毒抑制率,这并非依从性更好所致。

Higher rates of viral suppression with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors compared to single protease inhibitors are not explained by better adherence.

作者信息

Weiser Sheri D, Guzman David, Riley Elise D, Clark Richard, Bangsberg David R

机构信息

Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

出版信息

HIV Clin Trials. 2004 Sep-Oct;5(5):278-87. doi: 10.1310/LNHD-K1R7-HQP5-HJCQ.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although evidence suggests that antiretroviral (ARV) regimens containing nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are superior to single-protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens at suppressing viral load, it is unclear how much of the improved viral suppression is due to intrinsic drug potency versus higher levels of adherence to simpler regimens. We therefore examined adherence and viral suppression in NNRTI and single-PI regimens in a cohort of largely ARV-experienced participants by using objective measures of adherence.

METHOD

Participants were recruited from the Research on Access to Care in the Homeless (REACH) Cohort and were included in the study if they were on single-PI-based or NNRTI-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens for at least 3 months prior to study entry. Adherence was measured by unannounced pill counts at the participant's usual place of residence. The primary outcome was suppression of HIV viral RNA to <50 copies/mL.

RESULTS

Among 109 individuals who were followed for a median of 8.7 months, the odds of virologic suppression were approximately 8 times higher (p < .01) for participants on NNRTI-based regimens (n = 53) compared with those using single-PI-based regimens (n = 56) when controlling for adherence, as well as other potential confounders in a multivariable analysis. The only other independent predictors of viral suppression in multivariable modeling were ARV adherence (p < .01), CD4 nadir (p = .02), and continuous months on current regimen prior to the start of adherence monitoring (p < .01). There was no significant difference in adherence by unannounced pill counts in participants receiving NNRTI- versus single-PI-containing regimens.

CONCLUSION

A higher proportion of individuals using NNRTI-based regimens had viral suppression when compared to those taking single-PI-containing regimens, and this association was not confounded by higher levels of adherence. These results suggest that improved viral suppression on NNRTI regimens compared to single-PI regimens is more closely associated with regimen potency than higher levels of adherence.

摘要

背景

尽管有证据表明,含有非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTIs)的抗逆转录病毒(ARV)方案在抑制病毒载量方面优于基于单一蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)的方案,但尚不清楚病毒抑制的改善有多少归因于药物的内在效力, versus 更高水平的对更简单方案的依从性。因此,我们通过使用客观的依从性测量方法,在一组主要有抗逆转录病毒治疗经验的参与者中,研究了NNRTI方案和单一PI方案的依从性和病毒抑制情况。

方法

参与者从无家可归者获得医疗服务研究(REACH)队列中招募,如果他们在研究入组前至少3个月接受基于单一PI或基于NNRTI的高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)方案,则纳入研究。依从性通过在参与者通常居住的地方进行不预先通知的药丸计数来测量。主要结局是将HIV病毒RNA抑制至<50拷贝/毫升。

结果

在109名中位随访8.7个月的个体中,在多变量分析中控制依从性以及其他潜在混杂因素时,与使用基于单一PI方案(n = 56)的参与者相比,接受基于NNRTI方案(n = 53)的参与者病毒学抑制的几率高出约8倍(p <.01)。多变量建模中病毒抑制的唯一其他独立预测因素是抗逆转录病毒治疗的依从性(p <.01)、CD4最低点(p =.02)以及在开始依从性监测之前当前方案持续的月数(p <.01)。接受含NNRTI方案与含单一PI方案的参与者通过不预先通知的药丸计数得出的依从性没有显著差异。

结论

与接受含单一PI方案的个体相比,使用基于NNRTI方案的个体中有更高比例的人实现了病毒抑制,并且这种关联并未因更高水平的依从性而混淆。这些结果表明,与单一PI方案相比,NNRTI方案中病毒抑制的改善与方案效力的关联比与更高水平的依从性更为密切。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验