• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的早期经验。

Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Sim Hong Gee, Yip Sidney K H, Lau Weber K O, Tan James K, Cheng Christopher W S

机构信息

Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2004 Oct;27(4):321-5. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60060-9.

DOI:10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60060-9
PMID:15564188
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the feasibility of a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (rLRP) programme through a review of our early experience.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients underwent rLRP between 1 February 2003 and 31 December 2003 at Singapore General Hospital. All patients had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma on prostate biopsy and a negative bone scan. The Da Vinci robot was employed. The Montsouris technique was used for our first eight patients, and the Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy technique was used for all subsequent patients. We studied perioperative parameters and early surgical outcome prospectively.

RESULTS

The mean age at diagnosis was 63.9 +/- 5.6 years. The median Gleason sum was 6 (range, 5-9), and mean pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level was 10.5 +/- 5.4 ng/mL. The mean set-up time was 34 +/- 18 minutes, and mean dissection time was 247 +/- 43 minutes. Perioperative blood loss averaged 494 +/- 330 mL, and three patients required blood transfusion. Normal diet was resumed after 1.7 +/- 0.6 days. The mean duration of bladder catheterization was 9.8 +/- 6.1 days, and mean hospital stay was 2.7 +/- 1.3 days. There was no perioperative mortality or major complications, and no conversion to open radical prostatectomy. From Case 9 onwards, there was significant reduction in operating time (284 vs 215 minutes), blood loss (650 vs 400 mL) and hospital stay (3.8 vs 1.8 days).

CONCLUSIONS

rLRP is feasible in a practice with a low volume of radical prostatectomies. Significant improvement in perioperative parameters occurs after the first eight cases. This technique confers the benefits of enhanced precision and dexterity for complex laparoscopic work in the pelvic cavity.

摘要

引言

我们通过回顾早期经验来评估机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(rLRP)方案的可行性。

患者与方法

2003年2月1日至2003年12月31日期间,17例患者在新加坡总医院接受了rLRP手术。所有患者经前列腺活检组织学确诊为腺癌,且骨扫描阴性。采用达芬奇机器人。前8例患者采用蒙苏里技术,其后所有患者采用瓦蒂库蒂研究所前列腺切除术技术。我们前瞻性地研究围手术期参数和早期手术结果。

结果

诊断时的平均年龄为63.9±5.6岁。Gleason评分中位数为6(范围5 - 9),术前平均前列腺特异性抗原水平为10.5±5.4 ng/mL。平均安装时间为34±18分钟,平均解剖时间为247±43分钟。围手术期平均失血量为494±330 mL,3例患者需要输血。术后1.7±0.6天恢复正常饮食。平均膀胱导尿时间为9.8±6.1天,平均住院时间为2.7±1.3天。无围手术期死亡或重大并发症,无转为开放性根治性前列腺切除术的情况。从第9例病例起,手术时间(284分钟对215分钟)、失血量(650 mL对400 mL)和住院时间(3.8天对1.8天)均显著减少。

结论

在根治性前列腺切除术例数较少的情况下,rLRP是可行的。在前8例病例之后,围手术期参数有显著改善。该技术为盆腔复杂腹腔镜手术带来了更高的精准度和灵活性。

相似文献

1
Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的早期经验。
Asian J Surg. 2004 Oct;27(4):321-5. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60060-9.
2
A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与单纯腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的直接比较:单机构经验
J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):478-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.111. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
3
Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.经腹腔与腹膜外机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:一项前瞻性单术者随机对照研究。
Int J Urol. 2015 Oct;22(10):916-21. doi: 10.1111/iju.12854. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
4
[Complications and incidences in our first 250 robotic radical prostatectomies].[我们最初250例机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的并发症及发生率]
Actas Urol Esp. 2010 May;34(5):428-39.
5
[Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: report of 20 cases].[腹膜外机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:20例报告]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2012 May;32(5):749-51.
6
Team-based approach reduces learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.基于团队的方法可降低机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线。
Int J Urol. 2006 May;13(5):560-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01354.x.
7
Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in a matched-pair analysis.经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)后行根治性前列腺切除术:机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的配对分析。
J Endourol. 2012 Sep;26(9):1136-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0074. Epub 2012 May 31.
8
A comparison of perioperative outcome between robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single institution.机器人辅助与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术围手术期结局比较:单中心经验。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jul-Aug;45(4):695-702. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0367.
9
Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的短期疗效比较。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):660-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.036. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
10
[Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: report of 34 cases].机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:34例报告
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2014 Sep;20(9):808-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing technical expertise in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in a moderate-volume center through a proctor-based team approach.通过基于带教老师的团队方法,在一个中等手术量的中心培养机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的技术专长。
J Robot Surg. 2014 Sep;8(3):245-50. doi: 10.1007/s11701-014-0460-5. Epub 2014 Apr 20.
2
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 15 cases in Japan.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:日本的最初15例病例
J Robot Surg. 2008 Jul;2(2):85-8. doi: 10.1007/s11701-008-0087-5. Epub 2008 May 22.
3
Is the transition from open to robotic prostatectomy fair to your patients? A single-surgeon comparison with 2-year follow-up.
开放手术向机器人前列腺切除术的转变是否对您的患者公平?一位外科医生的 2 年随访比较。
J Robot Surg. 2010 Jan;3(4):201-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0162-6. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
4
Oncological outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in a multiracial Asian population.多族裔亚洲人群中机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的肿瘤学结局
J Robot Surg. 2015 Sep;9(3):201-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0516-1. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
5
Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for a single experienced surgeon: comparison with simultaneous laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.单一经验丰富的外科医生进行机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:与同期腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的比较。
World J Mens Health. 2015 Apr;33(1):30-5. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2015.33.1.30. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
6
Experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at a secondary training hospital: operation time, treatment outcomes, and complications with the accumulation of experience.二级培训医院机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的经验:手术时间、治疗效果及随着经验积累出现的并发症
Korean J Urol. 2013 Aug;54(8):522-6. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.8.522. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
7
Learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for pathologic t2 disease.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术治疗病理T2期疾病的学习曲线
Korean J Urol. 2010 Jan;51(1):30-3. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.1.30. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
8
Does robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy enable to obtain adequate oncological and functional outcomes during the learning curve? From the Korean experience.在学习曲线期间,机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术能否获得足够的肿瘤学和功能学结果?来自韩国的经验。
Asian J Androl. 2009 Mar;11(2):167-75. doi: 10.1038/aja.2008.52. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
9
Initial experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the Canadian health care system.加拿大医疗保健系统中机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的初步经验。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2007 Jun;1(2):97-101.
10
[Robotic surgery in urology].[泌尿外科中的机器人手术]
Urologe A. 2007 Sep;46(9):1239-42. doi: 10.1007/s00120-007-1487-2.