Bub Lawrence D, Blackmore C Craig, Mann Frederick A, Lomoschitz Friedrich M
Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Box 357115, 1959 NE Pacific St, RR 215, Seattle, WA 98195-7115, USA.
Radiology. 2005 Jan;234(1):143-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2341031692. Epub 2004 Nov 24.
To determine clinical predictors of cervical spine fracture in the elderly and to develop a clinical prediction rule to guide appropriate imaging in high-risk patients.
Institutional review board approval was received with waiver of informed consent. A retrospective case-control study was performed on blunt trauma patients 65 years and older with cervical spine fractures and on randomly selected control subjects without fracture. Potential predictors of fracture were evaluated through simple and multivariate logistic regression. Simple predictors were grouped into clinically similar composite variables and were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression and recursive partitioning. A clinical prediction rule was generated. The receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated and adjusted through bootstrap validation. Absolute cervical spine fracture probabilities were calculated by using Bayes theorem for all elderly patients and for patients who underwent computed tomography. Results were compared with a previous prediction rule for all adults.
Composite predictors of fracture in the elderly included focal neurologic deficit (adjusted odds ratio, 17.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8, 83.4), severe head injury (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI: 1.5, 7.1), high-energy mechanism (odds ratio 6.7; 95% CI: 3.1, 14.8), and moderate-energy mechanism (odds ratio 3.3; 95% CI: 1.3, 8.3). The prediction rule stratified patients into risk groups with fracture probabilities ranging from 0.4% (95% CI: 0.1%, 1.3%) to 24.2% (95% CI: 5.7%, 100%).
Clinical factors can be used to stratify patients 65 years and older into risk groups with a wide range of probabilities of cervical spine fracture. Knowledge of cervical fracture risk can help guide appropriate imaging in high-risk patients.
确定老年人颈椎骨折的临床预测因素,并制定临床预测规则,以指导高危患者进行适当的影像学检查。
获得机构审查委员会批准,豁免知情同意。对65岁及以上颈椎骨折的钝性创伤患者和随机选择的无骨折对照受试者进行回顾性病例对照研究。通过单因素和多因素逻辑回归评估骨折的潜在预测因素。将单因素预测因素分组为临床相似的复合变量,并通过多因素逻辑回归和递归划分进行分析。生成临床预测规则。计算受试者工作特征曲线,并通过自助法验证进行调整。使用贝叶斯定理计算所有老年患者和接受计算机断层扫描患者的绝对颈椎骨折概率。将结果与先前针对所有成年人的预测规则进行比较。
老年人骨折的复合预测因素包括局灶性神经功能缺损(调整后的优势比,17.7;95%置信区间[CI]:3.8,83.4)、重度颅脑损伤(优势比,3.2;95%CI:1.5,7.1)、高能量机制(优势比6.7;95%CI:3.1,14.8)和中等能量机制(优势比3.3;95%CI:1.3,8.3)。预测规则将患者分为风险组,骨折概率范围为0.4%(95%CI:0.1%,1.3%)至24.2%(95%CI:5.7%,100%)。
临床因素可用于将65岁及以上患者分为颈椎骨折概率范围广泛的风险组。了解颈椎骨折风险有助于指导高危患者进行适当的影像学检查。