Gottrup Hanne, Juhl Gitte, Kristensen Anders D, Lai Robert, Chizh Boris A, Brown John, Bach Flemming W, Jensen Troels S
Danish Pain Research Center, Department of Neurology and Danish Pain Research Center, University of Aarhus.
Anesthesiology. 2004 Dec;101(6):1400-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200412000-00021.
In chronic pain, increased activity from intact or damaged peripheral nerve endings results in an enhanced response in central pain transmission systems, a mechanism known as central sensitization. Central sensitization can also be invoked in human experimental models. Therefore, these models may be useful to characterize novel analgesics in humans. The anticonvulsant gabapentin has demonstrated efficacy in patients with neuropathic pain, but its mode of action remains unclear. This study examined the effects of gabapentin on signs of central sensitization (brush and pinprick hyperalgesia) in a human model of capsaicin-evoked pain, using a gabapentin dosing regimen similar to that used in the clinic. The aims were to determine whether gabapentin, dosed in a manner similar to that used in the clinic, affected the various components of central sensitization and to assess the utility of this model for characterizing novel analgesics.
Intradermal capsaicin (100 microg/20 microl) was administered in the volar forearm of 41 male human volunteers to induce pain and clinical signs of central sensitization. Gabapentin (titrated to 2,400 mg daily) or placebo was given orally for 15 days in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design. The capsaicin test was conducted at baseline and after gabapentin or placebo. Endpoints were the size of areas of brush-evoked allodynia (with cotton gauze) and pinprick hyperalgesia (with von Frey filament), and the intensity of ongoing brush- and pinprick-evoked pain.
Gabapentin significantly reduced the area of brush allodynia compared with placebo (P </= 0.05) and insignificantly attenuated the area of pinprick hyperalgesia. Gabapentin had no significant effect on spontaneous and evoked pain intensity.
Oral gabapentin, administered to healthy volunteers in a regimen similar to that used in treating chronic neuropathic pain, reduces measures of central sensitization evoked by intradermal capsaicin. This suggests that the pain-relieving effect in chronic neuropathic pain condition is linked to the effect of gabapentin on central sensitization. The ability of the capsaicin model to detect the efficacy of this standard treatment of neuropathic pain suggests that it may have a predictive value for detection of efficacy in human subjects.
在慢性疼痛中,完整或受损的外周神经末梢活动增加会导致中枢疼痛传导系统反应增强,这一机制被称为中枢敏化。中枢敏化也可在人体实验模型中引发。因此,这些模型可能有助于在人体中表征新型镇痛药。抗惊厥药物加巴喷丁已在神经性疼痛患者中显示出疗效,但其作用方式仍不清楚。本研究使用与临床所用相似的加巴喷丁给药方案,在辣椒素诱发疼痛的人体模型中研究了加巴喷丁对中枢敏化体征(刷擦和针刺痛觉过敏)的影响。目的是确定以与临床相似的方式给药的加巴喷丁是否会影响中枢敏化的各个组成部分,并评估该模型在表征新型镇痛药方面的效用。
在41名男性人类志愿者的掌侧前臂皮内注射辣椒素(100微克/20微升),以诱发疼痛和中枢敏化的临床体征。采用随机、双盲、平行组设计,口服加巴喷丁(滴定至每日2400毫克)或安慰剂,持续15天。在基线以及加巴喷丁或安慰剂治疗后进行辣椒素试验。终点指标为刷擦诱发的异常性疼痛(用棉纱布)和针刺痛觉过敏(用von Frey细丝)的面积大小,以及持续的刷擦和针刺诱发疼痛的强度。
与安慰剂相比,加巴喷丁显著减小了刷擦异常性疼痛的面积(P≤0.05),对针刺痛觉过敏面积的减轻作用不显著。加巴喷丁对自发痛和诱发痛强度无显著影响。
以与治疗慢性神经性疼痛相似的方案给健康志愿者口服加巴喷丁,可降低皮内注射辣椒素诱发的中枢敏化指标。这表明加巴喷丁在慢性神经性疼痛状况下的止痛效果与它对中枢敏化的作用有关。辣椒素模型检测这种神经性疼痛标准治疗方法疗效的能力表明,它可能对检测人体受试者的疗效具有预测价值。