Suppr超能文献

慢性主动脉夹层患者的难治性高血压

Resistant hypertension in patients with chronic aortic dissection.

作者信息

Eggebrecht H, Schmermund A, von Birgelen C, Naber C K, Bartel T, Wenzel R R, Erbel R

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, West-German Heart Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 2005 Mar;19(3):227-31. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001800.

Abstract

Strict blood pressure control is pivotal in the management of patients with aortic dissection (AD), but is frequently difficult to achieve. We determined antihypertensive medical therapy and levels of blood pressure (BP) control in 40 patients with chronic AD. Patient charts were reviewed for clinical variables, serial BP measurements, and antihypertensive drug therapy. Patients were divided into two groups: patients in group 1 had effective BP control (<135/80 mmHg), patients in group 2 had resistant hypertension (BP>/=135/80 mmHg despite prescription of at least three antihypertensive drugs). Overall, systolic BP (SBP) was 130+/-20 mmHg, and diastolic BP (DBP) was 72+/-13 mmHg. Patients received a median of 4 (1-6) antihypertensive drugs. beta-blockers were used in 38/40 (95%) patients. Effective BP control was achieved in 24/40 (60%) patients (group 1), while 16/40 (40%) patients had resistant hypertension (group 2) despite receiving significantly more antihypertensive drugs (5 [4-6] vs 4 [1-5], P=0.001). Mean SBP was 116+/-9 (101-132) mmHg in group 1 and 151+/-13 (137-181) mmHg in group 2 (P<0.001); there was no difference in DBP. Group 2 patients had a significantly higher body mass index and were younger than patients in group 1. In conclusion, in the majority of patients with chronic AD, effective BP control can be achieved, but usually requires the combination of multiple antihypertensive drugs. However, in a significant proportion of patients (40%), who appear to be younger and more obese, medical therapy fails to achieve effective BP control despite use of a multiple drug regimen.

摘要

严格控制血压是主动脉夹层(AD)患者管理的关键,但往往难以实现。我们确定了40例慢性AD患者的降压药物治疗及血压(BP)控制水平。回顾患者病历以获取临床变量、连续血压测量值及降压药物治疗情况。患者分为两组:第1组患者血压得到有效控制(<135/80 mmHg),第2组患者为顽固性高血压(尽管使用了至少三种降压药物,血压仍≥135/80 mmHg)。总体而言,收缩压(SBP)为130±20 mmHg,舒张压(DBP)为72±13 mmHg。患者接受的降压药物中位数为4(1 - 6)种。40例患者中有38例(95%)使用了β受体阻滞剂。40例患者中有24例(60%)实现了有效血压控制(第1组),而16例(40%)患者尽管使用了更多的降压药物(分别为5[4 - 6]种和4[1 - 5]种,P = 0.001),仍患有顽固性高血压(第2组)。第1组平均SBP为116±9(101 - 132)mmHg,第2组为151±13(137 - 181)mmHg(P<0.001);DBP无差异。第2组患者的体重指数显著更高,且比第1组患者更年轻。总之,在大多数慢性AD患者中,可以实现有效的血压控制,但通常需要多种降压药物联合使用。然而,在相当比例(40%)的患者中,这些患者似乎更年轻且更肥胖,尽管使用了多种药物治疗方案,药物治疗仍无法实现有效的血压控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验