Suppr超能文献

某些“非典型”和“传统”抗精神病药物对渐进比率程序表现影响的定量分析。

Quantitative analysis of the effects of some "atypical" and "conventional" antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance.

作者信息

Zhang Z, Rickard J F, Asgari K, Body S, Bradshaw C M, Szabadi E

机构信息

Psychopharmacology Section, Division of Psychiatry, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 May;179(2):489-97. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-2049-6. Epub 2004 Nov 25.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Performance on progressive ratio schedules has been proposed as a means of assessing the effects of drugs on the value or "efficacy" of reinforcers. A mathematical model affords a basis for quantifying the effects of drugs on progressive ratio schedule performance. According to this model, the relation between response rate and ratio size is described by a bitonic (inverted-U) function. One parameter of the function, alpha, expresses the motivational or "activating" effect of the reinforcer (duration of activation of responding produced by the reinforcer), whereas another parameter, delta, expresses the minimum time needed to execute a response, and is regarded as an index of "motor capacity". In a previous experiment we found that the "atypical" antipsychotic clozapine increased alpha, indicating an increase in the efficacy of a food reinforcer.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the effects of four "atypical" and four "conventional" antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance.

METHODS

Rats responded for a sucrose reinforcer (0.6 M, 50 microl) on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule (50-min sessions). After 90 preliminary training sessions, they received acute doses of antipsychotics (doses in mg kg(-1)): atypical: clozapine (2, 4, 8, IP; n=15), quetiapine (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, SC; n=23), olanzapine (0.25, 0.5, 1, IP; n=15), ziprasidone (0.625, 1.25, 2.5, IP, n=15); conventional: haloperidol (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, IP, n=15), pimozide (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, IP; n=15), raclopride (0.25, 0.5, 1, SC; n=12), cis-flupenthixol (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, SC; n=15). Values of a and delta were estimated from the response rate functions obtained under each treatment condition, and were compared between drug and vehicle-alone treatments.

RESULTS

The atypical antipsychotics significantly increased alpha (indicating enhancement of reinforcer efficacy), and also increased delta (indicating reduction of motor capacity). Haloperidol, pimozide and raclopride significantly increased delta; none of the conventional antipsychotics significantly altered alpha.

CONCLUSIONS

The results extend previous findings with clozapine to other atypical antipsychotics and suggest that enhancement of the efficacy of reinforcers may be a common feature of atypical antipsychotics not shared by conventional antipsychotics.

摘要

理论依据

渐进比率程序中的表现已被提议作为评估药物对强化物价值或“效力”影响的一种方法。一个数学模型为量化药物对渐进比率程序表现的影响提供了基础。根据该模型,反应率与比率大小之间的关系由一个双调(倒U形)函数描述。该函数的一个参数α表示强化物的动机或“激活”作用(强化物产生的反应激活持续时间),而另一个参数δ表示执行一次反应所需的最短时间,并被视为“运动能力”的指标。在先前的一项实验中,我们发现“非典型”抗精神病药物氯氮平增加了α,表明食物强化物的效力增强。

目的

我们研究了四种“非典型”和四种“传统”抗精神病药物对渐进比率程序表现的影响。

方法

大鼠在时间限制的渐进比率程序(50分钟时段)上为蔗糖强化物(0.6 M,50微升)做出反应。经过90次初步训练后,它们接受了抗精神病药物的急性剂量(毫克/千克剂量):非典型药物:氯氮平(2、4、8,腹腔注射;n = 15),喹硫平(1.25、2.5、5、10,皮下注射;n = 23),奥氮平(0.25、0.5、1,腹腔注射;n = 15),齐拉西酮(0.625、1.25、2.5,腹腔注射,n = 15);传统药物:氟哌啶醇(0.025、0.05、0.1,腹腔注射,n = 15),匹莫齐特(0.125、0.25、0.5,腹腔注射;n = 15),雷氯必利(0.25、0.5、1,皮下注射;n = 12),顺式氟奋乃静(0.2、0.4、0.8,皮下注射;n = 15)。根据每种治疗条件下获得的反应率函数估计α和δ的值,并在药物治疗和单独使用赋形剂治疗之间进行比较。

结果

非典型抗精神病药物显著增加了α(表明强化物效力增强),并且也增加了δ(表明运动能力降低)。氟哌啶醇、匹莫齐特和雷氯必利显著增加了δ;没有一种传统抗精神病药物显著改变α。

结论

结果将先前关于氯氮平的研究结果扩展到了其他非典型抗精神病药物,并表明强化物效力的增强可能是非典型抗精神病药物的一个共同特征,而传统抗精神病药物不具备这一特征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验