Wallin Eva, Andreásson Sven
Department of Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Crafoords väg 6, 113 24 Stockholm, Sweden.
Prev Sci. 2004 Dec;5(4):221-9. doi: 10.1023/b:prev.0000045356.37507.86.
This study evaluated the effects of a community alcohol prevention program on the frequency of alcohol service to young adults at licensed premises in Stockholm, Sweden. We used a pretest (1996)-posttests (1998 and 2001) design with intervention and control areas. The multicomponent intervention combines training of serving staff in responsible beverage service, policy initiatives, and enforcement of existing alcohol regulations. Adolescents 18 years old (the legal drinking age on licensed premises in Sweden), but younger looking according to an expert panel, visited licensed premises in pairs, where each adolescent ordered a beer. At baseline in 1996, the adolescents made 600 attempts to order. At follow-up in 1998, the number of attempts to order was 252, and at the second follow-up in 2001, the adolescents made 238 attempts. We found no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control areas. Overall, the frequency of alcohol service to adolescents on licensed premises in these areas of Stockholm decreased significantly over time, from 45 to 41 and to 32%, in 1996, 1998, and 2001, respectively. The decrease in alcohol service in 2001 was statistically significant compared to the baseline in 1996. One explanation for this improvement could be more effective enforcement of existing alcohol laws in both the intervention and control areas. We also found that licensed premises that used doormen to screen potential customers were less likely to sell to minors.
本研究评估了一项社区酒精预防计划对瑞典斯德哥尔摩持牌场所向年轻人提供酒精饮料频率的影响。我们采用了带有干预区和对照区的前测(1996年)-后测(1998年和2001年)设计。多组分干预措施包括对服务人员进行负责任饮酒服务培训、政策倡议以及执行现有的酒精法规。18岁的青少年(瑞典持牌场所的法定饮酒年龄),但根据专家小组的判断看起来更年轻,他们成对前往持牌场所,每个青少年点了一杯啤酒。1996年基线时,青少年进行了600次点酒尝试。1998年随访时,点酒尝试次数为252次,2001年第二次随访时,青少年进行了238次尝试。我们发现干预区和对照区之间没有统计学上的显著差异。总体而言,斯德哥尔摩这些地区持牌场所向青少年提供酒精饮料的频率随时间显著下降,1996年、1998年和2001年分别从45%降至41%,再降至32%。与1996年的基线相比,2001年酒精饮料供应的下降具有统计学显著性。对此改善的一种解释可能是干预区和对照区对现有酒精法律的执行更加有效。我们还发现,使用门卫筛选潜在顾客的持牌场所向未成年人销售酒水的可能性较小。