• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Effects of substrate components on hydrogen fermentation of multiple substrates.

作者信息

Bai M D, Cheng S S, Chao Y C

机构信息

Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2004;50(8):209-16.

PMID:15566205
Abstract

As is well known, carbohydrate is the most appropriate organic material for hydrogen fermentation, and its hydrogen yield is significantly larger than that of protein. The fermentation of protein began with hydrogen production followed by hydrogen consumption, which helps overall hydrogen recovery. Both carbohydrate and protein are basic components of organic material, and yet carbohydrate is known to be a better substrate than protein in terms of hydrogen yield during hydrogen fermentation. This study used multiple substrates containing different ratios of glucose and peptone as multiple substrates to investigate the roles played by carbohydrate and protein in hydrogen fermentation. The experimental results demonstrated that suitable ratios of glucose and peptone improved the growth of hydrogen producing bacteria. Additionally, a maximum hydrogen yield of 6.4 mmole-H2/g-COD was obtained from the multiple substrate containing 40% peptone and 60% glucose. Most of the produced hydrogen came from fermentation of glucose, not peptone. During hydrogen fermentation, the pH dropped by 1.0 and 1.9 units in 80% and 20% of peptone content in the substrate. Ammonia produced due to peptone degradation neutralized the acids produced from hydrogen fermentation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Effects of substrate components on hydrogen fermentation of multiple substrates.
Water Sci Technol. 2004;50(8):209-16.
2
A dual-substrate steady-state model for biological hydrogen production in an anaerobic hydrogen fermentation process.厌氧发酵产氢过程中生物制氢的双底物稳态模型。
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006 Oct 20;95(3):492-500. doi: 10.1002/bit.21041.
3
Anaerobic acidification of a synthetic wastewater in batch reactors at 55 degrees C.在55摄氏度下,于间歇式反应器中对合成废水进行厌氧酸化处理。
Water Sci Technol. 2002;46(11-12):153-7.
4
Hydrogen production from proteins via electrohydrogenesis in microbial electrolysis cells.微生物电解池通过电氢生物法从蛋白质中生产氢气。
Biosens Bioelectron. 2010 Aug 15;25(12):2690-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 May 10.
5
Effects of volatile fatty acids on a thermophilic anaerobic hydrogen fermentation process degrading peptone.挥发性脂肪酸对降解蛋白胨的嗜热厌氧发酵产氢过程的影响
Water Sci Technol. 2002;46(4-5):209-14.
6
Enhanced hydrogen and 1,3-propanediol production from glycerol by fermentation using mixed cultures.利用混合培养物通过发酵从甘油生产强化氢气和 1,3-丙二醇。
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Dec 15;104(6):1098-106. doi: 10.1002/bit.22487.
7
Biohydrogen production by mesophilic fermentation of food wastewater.利用食品废水进行中温发酵产氢
Water Sci Technol. 2004;49(5-6):223-8.
8
Improvement of fermentative hydrogen production: various approaches.发酵产氢的改进:多种方法
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 Oct;65(5):520-9. doi: 10.1007/s00253-004-1644-0. Epub 2004 Jul 31.
9
Performance comparison of a continuous-flow stirred-tank reactor and an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor for fermentative hydrogen production depending on substrate concentration.连续流搅拌釜式反应器和厌氧序批式反应器在不同底物浓度下发酵产氢的性能比较
Water Sci Technol. 2005;52(10-11):23-9.
10
Continuous hydrogen production from glucose by using extreme thermophilic anaerobic microflora.利用极端嗜热厌氧微生物菌群从葡萄糖中持续产氢。
J Biosci Bioeng. 2009 Jan;107(1):64-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2008.09.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced bio-hydrogen production from protein wastewater by altering protein structure and amino acids acidification type.通过改变蛋白质结构和氨基酸酸化类型来提高蛋白质废水的生物制氢产量。
Sci Rep. 2014 Feb 5;4:3992. doi: 10.1038/srep03992.