• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入式心脏复律除颤器植入期间确定易损性上限以尽量减少室颤诱发情况。

Upper limit of vulnerability determination during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement to minimize ventricular fibrillation inductions.

作者信息

Glikson Michael, Gurevitz Osnat T, Trusty Jane M, Sharma Vinod, Luria David M, Eldar Michael, Shen Win-Kuang, Rea Robert F, Hammill Stephen C, Friedman Paul A

机构信息

Sheba Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2004 Dec 1;94(11):1445-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.07.151.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.07.151
PMID:15566924
Abstract

The defibrillation threshold (DFT) and upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) were determined using step-down protocols in 50 patients who underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement or testing. The sensitivity and specificity of each ULV energy level was assessed for detecting an increased DFT, correlation of the DFT and ULV, and optimal shock timing for ULV determination. A ULV <10 or 11 J (failure to induce ventricular fibrillation with 10- to 11-J shocks) was 100% predictive of an acceptable DFT and may be sufficient to exclude unacceptable DFTs in 60% of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients. All 4 shocks used to scan the peak of the T wave during ULV testing were necessary for accurate ULV determination.

摘要

采用逐步降低方案,对50例接受植入式心脏复律除颤器植入或测试的患者测定除颤阈值(DFT)和易损上限(ULV)。评估每个ULV能量水平检测DFT升高的敏感性和特异性、DFT与ULV的相关性以及确定ULV的最佳电击时机。ULV<10或11 J(10至11 J电击未能诱发心室颤动)对可接受的DFT具有100%的预测性,可能足以排除60%的植入式心脏复律除颤器接受者中不可接受的DFT。在ULV测试期间,用于扫描T波峰值的所有4次电击对于准确确定ULV都是必要的。

相似文献

1
Upper limit of vulnerability determination during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement to minimize ventricular fibrillation inductions.植入式心脏复律除颤器植入期间确定易损性上限以尽量减少室颤诱发情况。
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Dec 1;94(11):1445-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.07.151.
2
Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).大多数植入式心脏复律除颤器/心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者可行无诱导或有限电击测试:多中心ASSURE研究(心律失常单次电击除颤阈值测试与易损性上限:植入式心脏复律除颤器植入的风险降低评估)结果
Circulation. 2007 May 8;115(18):2382-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.663112. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
3
Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.易损性上限是经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器的人类患者中与90%成功除颤概率相关的电击强度的良好估计指标。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Apr;27(5):1112-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00603-6.
4
Detection of the defibrillation threshold using the upper limit of vulnerability following defibrillator implantation.植入除颤器后利用易损性上限检测除颤阈值。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jun;28(6):498-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.50008.x.
5
Assessment of adequate safety margin using single coupling interval-upper limit of vulnerability test.使用单联律间期-易损性上限测试评估足够的安全边际。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Jan;37(1):95-103. doi: 10.1111/pace.12251. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
6
Determination of the upper limit of vulnerability using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator electrograms.使用植入式心脏复律除颤器心电图确定易损性上限
Circulation. 2003 Jun 24;107(24):3028-33. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000074220.19414.18. Epub 2003 Jun 16.
7
Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs.使用易损性上限评估植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入时的除颤效果。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Feb;30(2):258-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00659.x.
8
Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.正常窦性心律下测定的急性和慢性除颤阈值与易损上限的相关性。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999 Jul;3(2):155-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1009825731592.
9
The effect of induction method on defibrillation threshold and ventricular fibrillation cycle length.诱导方法对除颤阈值和心室颤动周期长度的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Apr;17(4):377-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00352.x.
10
Influence of drive cycle length on initiation of ventricular fibrillation during implantable cardioverter defibrillator threshold testing.植入式心脏复律除颤器阈值测试期间驱动周期长度对心室颤动起始的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Sep;29(9):926-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00464.x.

引用本文的文献

1
ICD Shock, Not Ventricular Fibrillation, Causes Elevation of High Sensitive Troponin T after Defibrillation Threshold Testing--The Prospective, Randomized, Multicentre TropShock-Trial.除颤阈值测试后,ICD电击而非室颤导致高敏肌钙蛋白T升高——前瞻性、随机、多中心TropShock试验
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0131570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131570. eCollection 2015.
2
Effect of drugs on defibrillation capacity.药物对除颤能力的影响。
Drugs. 2008;68(5):607-30. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868050-00004.