Wang Weijie, Crompton Robin H, Carey Tanya S, Günther Michael M, Li Yu, Savage Russell, Sellers Williams I
Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.
J Hum Evol. 2004 Dec;47(6):453-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.08.007.
Size and proportions of the postcranial skeleton differ markedly between Australopithecus afarensis and Homo ergaster, and between the latter and modern Homo sapiens. This study uses computer simulations of gait in models derived from the best-known skeletons of these species (AL 288-1, Australopithecus afarensis, 3.18 million year ago) and KNM-WT 15000 (Homo ergaster, 1.5-1.8 million year ago) compared to models of adult human males and females, to estimate the required muscle power during bipedal walking, and to compare this with those in modern humans. Skeletal measurements were carried out on a cast of KNM-WT 15000, but for AL 288-1 were taken from the literature. Muscle attachments were applied to the models based on their position relative to the bone in modern humans. Joint motions and moments from experiments on human walking were input into the models to calculate muscle stress and power. The models were tested in erect walking and 'bent-hip bent-knee' gait. Calculated muscle forces were verified against EMG activity phases from experimental data, with reference to reasonable activation/force delays. Calculated muscle powers are reasonably comparable to experimentally derived metabolic values from the literature, given likely values for muscle efficiency. The results show that: 1) if evaluated by the power expenditure per unit of mass (W/kg) in walking, AL 288-1 and KNM-WT 15000 would need similar power to modern humans; however, 2) with distance-specific parameters as the criteria, AL 288-1 would require to expend relatively more muscle power (W/kg.m(-1)) in comparison to modern humans. The results imply that in the evolution of bipedalism, body proportions, for example those of KNM-WT 15000, may have evolved to obtain an effective application of muscle power to bipedal walking over a long distance, or at high speed.
南方古猿阿法种与匠人之间,以及匠人与现代智人之间,颅后骨骼的大小和比例存在显著差异。本研究利用计算机对这些物种最著名骨骼(318万年前的南方古猿阿法种AL 288-1)和(150万至180万年前的匠人KNM-WT 15000)所构建模型的步态进行模拟,并与成年男性和女性模型进行比较,以估算两足行走过程中所需的肌肉力量,并将其与现代人的肌肉力量进行比较。对KNM-WT 15000的铸型进行了骨骼测量,但AL 288-1的骨骼测量数据来自文献。根据肌肉附着点相对于现代人骨骼的位置,将其应用于模型。将人类行走实验中的关节运动和力矩输入模型,以计算肌肉应力和力量。对模型进行了直立行走和“屈髋屈膝”步态测试。根据实验数据的肌电图活动阶段,并参考合理的激活/力量延迟,对计算出的肌肉力量进行了验证。考虑到肌肉效率的可能值,计算出的肌肉力量与文献中实验得出的代谢值具有合理的可比性。结果表明:1)如果以行走时每单位质量的能量消耗(W/kg)来评估,AL 288-1和KNM-WT 15000所需的能量与现代人相似;然而,2)以距离特定参数为标准,与现代人相比,AL 288-1需要消耗相对更多的肌肉力量(W/kg·m⁻¹)。结果表明,在两足行走的进化过程中,身体比例,例如KNM-WT 15000的身体比例,可能已经进化到能够有效地将肌肉力量应用于长距离或高速的两足行走。