Jilek C, Marienhagen J, Hacki T
Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Department of ENT, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
J Voice. 2004 Dec;18(4):443-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.01.002.
Functional (nonorganic) dysphonia is often characterized by vocal instability. The purpose of the prospective study was to examine whether there is a difference in vocal instability of functional dysphonic voices compared with healthy ones, this means whether electroglottographic perturbation values differ (1) between healthy and dysphonic voices and (2) between two subgroups of the dysphponic voices (hypertonic and hypotonic dysphonic voices). Twenty-three patients with hypertonic functional dysphonia, 9 with hypotonic functional dysphonia and 31 healthy nonsmokers, were each examined electroglottographically before (Ex 1), immediately after (Ex 2), and 1 hour after (Ex 3) voice loading. Perturbations of frequency, amplitude, quasi-open-quotient, and contact-index were calculated from the EGG signal. At all three times of examination, hypertonic dysphonic voices showed higher perturbations than healthy voices, and they had higher perturbations than hypotonic dysphonic voices before and 1 hour after voice loading. Hypotonic dysphonic voices showed higher perturbations than healthy voices only 1 hour after voice loading. Voice loading induced different reactions in dysphonic voices: Some voices showed increased perturbations, and others exhibited normal or even decreased perturbation immediately after voice loading. Examination of electroglottographic-derived perturbations immediately after voice loading seems not to be useful. Differentiation of hypertonic and hypotonic dysphonic voices was possible with an estimated sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 87.0% by using the sum of the amplitude-perturbation and the quasi-open-quotient-perturbation measured before voice loading.
功能性(非器质性)发声障碍通常表现为嗓音不稳定。这项前瞻性研究的目的是检验功能性发声障碍嗓音与健康嗓音在嗓音不稳定方面是否存在差异,即电声门图扰动值在(1)健康嗓音与发声障碍嗓音之间以及(2)发声障碍嗓音的两个亚组(高音调发声障碍嗓音和低音调发声障碍嗓音)之间是否不同。23例高音调功能性发声障碍患者、9例低音调功能性发声障碍患者和31名健康非吸烟者,在嗓音负荷前(检查1)、负荷后即刻(检查2)以及负荷后1小时(检查3)分别接受电声门图检查。从电声门图信号中计算频率、幅度、准开放商和接触指数的扰动值。在所有三次检查中,高音调发声障碍嗓音的扰动值均高于健康嗓音,且在嗓音负荷前及负荷后1小时,其扰动值高于低音调发声障碍嗓音。低音调发声障碍嗓音仅在嗓音负荷后1小时的扰动值高于健康嗓音。嗓音负荷在发声障碍嗓音中引发了不同反应:一些嗓音的扰动值增加,而另一些嗓音在负荷后即刻的扰动值正常甚至降低。负荷后即刻检查电声门图衍生的扰动值似乎并无用处。通过使用负荷前测量的幅度扰动值和准开放商扰动值之和,区分高音调与低音调发声障碍嗓音的估计敏感度为88.9%,特异度为87.0%。