Ziermann Rainer, Celis Linda, Derdelinckx Inge, Lambert Christine, Veeck Jürgen, Rizzo Maria Gabriella, Vanderborght Bart, Zissis Georges, Clumeck Nathan, Fransen Katrien, Vaira Dolores, Hendricks David, Van Laethem Kristel, Vandamme Anne-Mieke, Schmit Jean-Claude, Knechten Heribert, De Luca Andrea, Louwagie Joost, Segers Pascale, De Boeck Kristel, Pottel Hans, De Brauwer Annelies, Hulstaert Frank
Bayer HealthCare LLC, Diagnostics Division, 800 Dwight Way, Berkeley, CA 94710, USA.
J Clin Virol. 2004 Dec;31 Suppl 1:S7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.09.014.
Resistance testing is increasingly accepted as a tool in guiding the selection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infected individuals who fail their current regimen.
To descriptively compare the correlation between virologic treatment response and results using three genotypic HIV-1 drug resistance interpretation systems: the VERSANT HIV-1 Resistance Assay (LiPA) system and two sequence-based interpretation systems.
Specimens from 213 HIV-1-infected subjects, either starting (n=104) or switching to (n=109) a regimen of three or four antiretroviral drugs, were collected retrospectively at baseline and after 3 months of uninterrupted therapy. The correlation between viral load change and the number of predicted active drugs in the treatment regimen was assessed. An interpretation algorithm was recently developed to process VERSANT HIV-1 Resistance Assay (LiPA) data. The number of active drugs predicted using this algorithm was rank correlated with the viral load change over a 3-month treatment period. For comparison, a similar calculation was made using two sequence-based algorithms (REGA version 5.5 and VGI GuideLines Rules 4.0), both applied on the same sequences.
Statistically significant (p<0.05) correlation coefficients for each of the three HIV-1 drug resistance interpretation systems were observed in the treatment-experienced subjects on a 3-drug regimen (-0.39, -0.38, and -0.42, respectively) as well as on a 4-drug regimen (-0.33, -0.31, and -0.37, respectively). However, no significant correlation was observed in treatment-naive subjects, probably due to the very low frequency of drug resistance in these subjects.
All three genotypic drug resistance interpretation systems (LiPA version 1, REGA version 5.5, and VGI GuideLines Rules 4.0) were statistically significantly correlated with virologic therapy response as measured by viral load testing.
对于当前抗逆转录病毒治疗方案失败的人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)感染者,耐药性检测作为指导选择HIV-1抗逆转录病毒治疗的工具越来越被认可。
使用三种基因型HIV-1耐药性解读系统,即VERSANT HIV-1耐药性检测(LiPA)系统和两种基于序列的解读系统,以描述性方式比较病毒学治疗反应与结果之间的相关性。
回顾性收集213例HIV-1感染者的样本,这些感染者开始(n = 104)或转换(n = 109)为包含三种或四种抗逆转录病毒药物的治疗方案,分别在基线期和连续治疗3个月后采集样本。评估病毒载量变化与治疗方案中预测的有效药物数量之间的相关性。最近开发了一种解读算法来处理VERSANT HIV-1耐药性检测(LiPA)数据。使用该算法预测的有效药物数量与3个月治疗期内的病毒载量变化进行等级相关分析。为作比较,使用两种基于序列的算法(REGA版本5.5和VGI指南规则4.0)对相同序列进行类似计算。
在接受过治疗的受试者中,对于三种HIV-1耐药性解读系统中的每一种,在三联治疗方案中(分别为-0.39、-0.38和-0.42)以及四联治疗方案中(分别为-0.33、-0.31和-0.37)均观察到具有统计学意义(p<0.05)的相关系数。然而,在初治受试者中未观察到显著相关性,可能是由于这些受试者中耐药性的频率非常低。
所有三种基因型耐药性解读系统(LiPA版本1、REGA版本5.5和VGI指南规则4.0)与通过病毒载量检测衡量的病毒学治疗反应在统计学上均具有显著相关性。