De Luca Andrea, Vendittelli Marilena, Baldini Francesco, Di Giambenedetto Simona, Trotta Maria Paola, Cingolani Antonella, Bacarelli Alessandra, Gori Caterina, Perno Carlo Federico, Antinori Andrea, Ulivi Giovanni
Institute of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Antivir Ther. 2004 Aug;9(4):583-93.
To evaluate whether fuzzy operators can be usefully applied to the interpretation of genotypic HIV-1 drug resistance by experts, and to improve the prediction of salvage therapy outcome by adapting interpretation rules of genotypic resistance on the basis of their association with virological response data.
We used a clinical dataset of 231 patients failing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and starting salvage therapy with baseline resistance genotyping and virological outcomes after 3 and 6 months. A set of rules predicting genotypic resistance was initially derived from an expert (ADL). Rules were implemented using a fuzzy logic approach and the virological outcomes dataset used for the training phase. The resulting algorithm was validated using a separate set of 184 selected patients by correlating the resulting predicted activity with observed virological response at 3 months. For comparison, the expert systems from the drug resistance group of the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS-AC11) and the algorithm from the Stanford's HIV drug resistance database (Stanford HIVdb) were evaluated on the same set.
The starting algorithm had a correlation with virological outcomes of R2=0.06 (P=0.0001). After the training phase the correlation with virological outcomes increased to R2=0.19 (P<0.000001). In the validation set of patients, the activity of the salvage regimen predicted by the fuzzy algorithm was the only variable independently predictive of the 3-month viral load change even after adjusting by the activity predicted by the two expert systems and baseline viral load (for each 10% salvage regimen's activity increase, mean HIV RNA change from baseline: -0.27 log10 copies/ml; 95% CI -0.39, -0.15).
Using fuzzy operators in a virological outcomes training database to implement a rules-based algorithm for genotypic resistance interpretation, significant improvements of outcomes prediction were obtained. The resulting algorithm showed an independent predictive capability of virological outcomes over that of two rules-based interpretation algorithms made by experts. Although the system was trained and validated on a limited number of cases, the approach deserves further evaluation.
评估模糊算子是否能有效地应用于专家对HIV-1基因型耐药性的解读,并通过根据基因型耐药性与病毒学应答数据的关联调整解读规则,来改善挽救治疗结果的预测。
我们使用了一个包含231例高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)失败且开始挽救治疗的患者的临床数据集,这些患者有基线耐药基因分型以及3个月和6个月后的病毒学结果。一组预测基因型耐药性的规则最初由一位专家(ADL)得出。使用模糊逻辑方法和用于训练阶段的病毒学结果数据集来实施这些规则。通过将所得预测活性与3个月时观察到的病毒学应答相关联,使用另一组184例选定患者对所得算法进行验证。为作比较,在同一组患者中对法国国家艾滋病研究机构(ANRS-AC11)耐药性小组的专家系统和斯坦福HIV耐药数据库(Stanford HIVdb)的算法进行评估。
初始算法与病毒学结果的相关性为R2 = 0.06(P = 0.0001)。训练阶段后,与病毒学结果的相关性增至R2 = 0.19(P < 0.000001)。在患者验证集中,即使在根据两个专家系统预测的活性和基线病毒载量进行调整后,模糊算法预测的挽救治疗方案活性仍是独立预测3个月病毒载量变化的唯一变量(挽救治疗方案活性每增加10%,HIV RNA相对于基线的平均变化:-0.27 log10拷贝/ml;95%置信区间-0.39,-0.15)。
在病毒学结果训练数据库中使用模糊算子来实施基于规则的基因型耐药性解读算法,可显著改善结果预测。所得算法显示出相对于专家制定的两种基于规则的解读算法而言,对病毒学结果具有独立的预测能力。尽管该系统是在有限数量的病例上进行训练和验证的,但该方法值得进一步评估。