• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[脊髓型颈椎病病理生理学的当前争议]

[Current controversies in pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy].

作者信息

Martín-Láez R, Pinto-Rafael J I, Carda-Llop J R, Sanz Alonso F, Montiaga-Núñez F, Paternina-Vidal B, Vázquez-Barquero A

机构信息

Servicio de Neurocirugía [corrected] Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander.

出版信息

Neurologia. 2004 Dec;19(10):738-60.

PMID:15568172
Abstract

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is the most severe consequence of degenerative disease of cervical spine. In this article we perform a bibliographic review, addressing current controversies in its pathophysiology. Present work lines of most groups dedicated to the study of this condition are focused on improving surgical techniques designed for the treatment of this disease. Pathophysiological studies are scarce, and most of our pathophysiological knowledge of cervical spondylotic myelopathy is based in works done in 60s and 70s. Literature of the last decade lacks neurochemichal studies parallel to those existing for acute spinal injury. In the same way, only three prospective clinical trials comparing conservative and surgical treatment have been done, and none of them has demonstrated clear superiority of surgery. Given the high prevalence of this disease, the need for deep knowledge of its pathophysiologic, neurochemichal and molecular basis, and the optimization of surgical treatment is justified. This probably implies the need for prospective randomized trials to determine which patients are going to benefit from surgery.

摘要

脊髓型颈椎病是颈椎退行性疾病最严重的后果。在本文中,我们进行了文献综述,探讨其病理生理学方面当前存在的争议。大多数致力于研究这种病症的团队目前的工作方向集中在改进用于治疗该疾病的手术技术上。病理生理学研究很少,我们对脊髓型颈椎病的大多数病理生理学认识都基于20世纪60年代和70年代所做的工作。过去十年的文献缺乏与急性脊髓损伤现有研究并行的神经化学研究。同样,仅进行了三项比较保守治疗和手术治疗的前瞻性临床试验,而且没有一项试验证明手术具有明显优势。鉴于这种疾病的高发病率,深入了解其病理生理、神经化学和分子基础以及优化手术治疗是合理的。这可能意味着需要进行前瞻性随机试验,以确定哪些患者将从手术中获益。

相似文献

1
[Current controversies in pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy].[脊髓型颈椎病病理生理学的当前争议]
Neurologia. 2004 Dec;19(10):738-60.
2
Cervical myelopathy associated with degenerative spine disease and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.与退行性脊柱疾病及后纵韧带骨化相关的脊髓型颈椎病
Semin Neurol. 2002 Jun;22(2):143-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-36537.
3
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a brief review of its pathophysiology, clinical course, and diagnosis.脊髓型颈椎病:对其病理生理学、临床病程及诊断的简要综述
Neurosurgery. 2007 Jan;60(1 Supp1 1):S35-41. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000215383.64386.82.
4
Decompression for cervical myelopathy.颈椎脊髓病减压术
Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6 Suppl):317S-322S. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.026.
5
Does nonoperative management play a role in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy?非手术治疗在脊髓型颈椎病的治疗中起作用吗?
Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6 Suppl):175S-181S. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.015.
6
Indications for circumferential surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.脊髓型颈椎病的环形手术指征。
Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6 Suppl):299S-307S. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.025.
7
[Myelopathy-hand and cervical spondylotic myelopathy].[脊髓病手与颈椎病性脊髓病]
Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2000 Apr 28;25(2):179-80.
8
Surgical management of cervical myelopathy: indications and techniques for surgical corpectomy.脊髓型颈椎病的外科治疗:椎体次全切除手术的适应证及技术
Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6 Suppl):233S-241S. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.007.
9
Prognostic value of somatosensory-evoked potentials in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.体感诱发电位在脊髓型颈椎病手术治疗中的预后价值
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 1;33(10):E305-10. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f6c8e.
10
Neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, and cervical myelopathy: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical evaluation.颈部疼痛、神经根型颈椎病和脊髓型颈椎病:病理生理学、自然病史及临床评估
Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:479-88.