Murray Patrick T, Reddy Bharathi V, Grossman Eric J, Hammes Mary S, Trevino Sharon, Ferrell Janice, Tang Ignatius, Hursting Marcie J, Shamp Trisha R, Swan Suzanne K
Nephrology Section, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60657, USA.
Kidney Int. 2004 Dec;66(6):2446-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.66022.x.
We prospectively evaluated 3 treatment regimens of argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, for providing adequate, safe anticoagulation in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) during hemodialysis.
In this randomized, 3-way crossover study, ESRD patients underwent hemodialysis sessions of 3- or 4-hour duration using high-flux membranes and each of 3 argatroban treatment regimens (A: 250-microg/kg bolus, with an additional 250-microg/kg bolus allowed; B: 250-microg/kg bolus followed by 2-microg/kg/min infusion; C: steady-state, 2-microg/kg/min infusion initiated 4 hours before dialysis). Pharmacodynamic effects including activated clotting times (ACTs); hemodialysis efficacy including single-pool Kt/V, urea reduction ratio (URR), and circuit flow; and safety through a 3-day follow-up were monitored. Argatroban pharmacokinetic parameters including dialytic clearance were evaluated during regimen C.
Thirteen patients completed 38 hemodialysis sessions (1 patient withdrew consent after 2 sessions). Mean +/- SD ACTs increased from 131 +/- 14 seconds at baseline to 153 +/- 24, 200 +/- 30, and 197 +/- 33 seconds, respectively, after 60 minutes of hemodialysis using regimens A, B, and C. Across regimens, mean Kt/Vs (1.5-1.6) and URRs (70%-73%) were comparable. No dialyzer was changed; 1 session was shortened 15 minutes because of circuit clot formation. Systemic argatroban clearance increased approximately 20% during hemodialysis, without clinically significantly affecting ACTs. Upon argatroban discontinuation, ACTs and plasma argatroban decreased concurrently (elimination half-life, 35 +/- 6 min). No thrombosis, bleeding, serious adverse events, or clinically significant changes in vital signs or routine laboratory measures occurred.
Argatroban, administered by each treatment regimen, provides safe, adequate anticoagulation to enable successful hemodialysis in ESRD patients. Argatroban dialytic clearance by high-flux membranes is clinically insignificant.
我们前瞻性地评估了直接凝血酶抑制剂阿加曲班的三种治疗方案,以在血液透析期间为终末期肾病(ESRD)患者提供充分、安全的抗凝作用。
在这项随机、三向交叉研究中,ESRD患者使用高通量膜进行3或4小时的血液透析疗程,并采用三种阿加曲班治疗方案中的每一种(A:250μg/kg静脉推注,允许额外250μg/kg静脉推注;B:250μg/kg静脉推注,随后以2μg/kg/分钟输注;C:稳态,在透析前4小时开始以2μg/kg/分钟输注)。监测包括活化凝血时间(ACT)在内的药效学效应;包括单池Kt/V、尿素清除率(URR)和回路流量在内的血液透析疗效;以及通过3天随访的安全性。在方案C期间评估包括透析清除率在内的阿加曲班药代动力学参数。
13名患者完成了38次血液透析疗程(1名患者在2次疗程后撤回同意)。在使用方案A、B和C进行60分钟血液透析后,平均±标准差ACT分别从基线时的131±14秒增加到153±24、200±30和197±33秒。在各方案中,平均Kt/V(1.5 - 1.6)和URR(70% - 73%)具有可比性。未更换透析器;1次疗程因回路凝血形成缩短15分钟。血液透析期间全身阿加曲班清除率增加约20%,但对ACT无临床显著影响。停用阿加曲班后,ACT和血浆阿加曲班同时下降(消除半衰期,35±6分钟)。未发生血栓形成、出血、严重不良事件或生命体征或常规实验室指标的临床显著变化。
每种治疗方案给予的阿加曲班可为ESRD患者提供安全、充分的抗凝作用,以实现成功的血液透析。高通量膜对阿加曲班的透析清除率在临床上无显著意义。