Suppr超能文献

健康受试者中阿加曲班与肝素抗凝作用及安全性的比较。

Comparison of anticoagulant effects and safety of argatroban and heparin in healthy subjects.

作者信息

Swan S K, St Peter J V, Lambrecht L J, Hursting M J

机构信息

Hennepin County Medical Center and Total Renal Research, Inc., Division of Nephrology, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2000 Jul;20(7):756-70. doi: 10.1592/phco.20.9.756.35194.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the relationship between dosage and coagulation parameters, as well as safety profiles, of ascending bolus and infusion dosages of argatroban versus heparin in three phase I studies.

DESIGN

Two randomized, double-blind studies compared argatroban and heparin, and one open-label, dose-escalation study further evaluated argatroban.

SETTING

University teaching hospital clinical research unit.

PATIENTS

Healthy men (aged 22-62 yrs).

INTERVENTION

In the first study, 36 subjects received an argatroban 30-, 60-, 120-, or 240-microg/kg bolus, or a heparin 30-, 60-, 120-, or 240-U/kg bolus for three subjects, then amended to 15, 30, 60, or 120 U/kg. In the second study, 37 subjects received argatroban 1.25, 2.5, 5, or 10 microg/kg/minute with or without a 250-microg/kg bolus, or heparin 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, or 0.30 U/kg/minute with or without a 125-U/kg bolus. In the third study (open-label), nine subjects received an argatroban 250-microg/kg bolus plus an infusion of 15, 20, 30, and 40 microg/kg/minute.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

When administered as a bolus dose in the first study, argatroban and heparin both produced dose-related increases in activated clotting time (ACT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) within 10 minutes of administration. Dissipation of anticoagulant effect was approximately 4-fold faster for argatroban than for heparin. When administered by infusion with or without a bolus in the second study, argatroban, but not heparin, produced predictable dose-related increases in ACT and aPTT that were generally consistent across both effect measures and modes of administration. Effect steady state was attained by five or more subjects per dosing group receiving argatroban (5-9) but typically two or fewer subjects per group receiving heparin (0-7). Furthermore, upon cessation of infusion, anticoagulant effects dissipated faster for argatroban (effect half-life 18-41 min) than for heparin (effect half-life 23-134 min). When argatroban was infused without a bolus, peak and effect steady-state values for ACT and aPTT generally were attained within 1-3 hours. Data from the second and third studies show that for argatroban dosages up to 40 microg/kg/minute, plasma drug concentrations attained at 4 hours of infusion increased linearly with dose, and weight-adjusted plasma clearance was dose independent. In all studies, argatroban and heparin were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation was more predictable with argatroban than with heparin as measured by ACT and aPTT, with comparable safety profiles.

摘要

研究目的

在三项I期研究中评估并比较阿加曲班与肝素递增推注剂量和输注剂量的给药方式下剂量与凝血参数之间的关系以及安全性。

设计

两项随机、双盲研究比较了阿加曲班和肝素,一项开放标签、剂量递增研究进一步评估了阿加曲班。

地点

大学教学医院临床研究单位。

患者

健康男性(年龄22 - 62岁)。

干预措施

在第一项研究中,36名受试者接受阿加曲班30、60、120或240μg/kg推注,或肝素30、60、120或240 U/kg推注(三名受试者),随后调整为15、30、60或120 U/kg。在第二项研究中,37名受试者接受阿加曲班1.25、2.5、5或10μg/kg/分钟输注(有或无250μg/kg推注),或肝素0.15、0.20、0.25或0.30 U/kg/分钟输注(有或无125 U/kg推注)。在第三项研究(开放标签)中,9名受试者接受阿加曲班250μg/kg推注加15、20、30和40μg/kg/分钟输注。

测量指标和主要结果

在第一项研究中以推注剂量给药时,阿加曲班和肝素在给药后10分钟内均使活化凝血时间(ACT)和活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)出现剂量相关增加。阿加曲班抗凝作用的消散速度比肝素快约4倍。在第二项研究中,无论有无推注,以输注方式给药时,阿加曲班可使ACT和aPTT出现可预测的剂量相关增加,这在两种效应指标和给药方式中总体一致。每个给药组接受阿加曲班(5 - 9名)的5名或更多受试者达到效应稳态,但接受肝素(0 - 7名)的每组通常2名或更少受试者达到效应稳态。此外,输注停止后,阿加曲班的抗凝作用消散更快(效应半衰期18 - 41分钟),而肝素的效应半衰期为23 - 134分钟。当阿加曲班无推注输注时,ACT和aPTT的峰值和效应稳态值通常在1 - 3小时内达到。第二项和第三项研究的数据表明,对于阿加曲班剂量高达40μg/kg/分钟,输注4小时时达到的血浆药物浓度随剂量呈线性增加,且体重校正的血浆清除率与剂量无关。在所有研究中,阿加曲班和肝素耐受性良好。

结论

以ACT和aPTT衡量,阿加曲班的抗凝作用比肝素更可预测,且安全性相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验