Goonetilleke Ashantha, Thomas Evan, Ginn Simon, Gilbert Dale
School of Civil Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, G.P.O. Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2005 Jan;74(1):31-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.08.006.
Urbanisation significantly impacts water environments with increased runoff and the degradation of water quality. The management of quantity impacts are straight forward, but quality impacts are far more complex. Current approaches to safeguard water quality are largely ineffective and guided by entrenched misconceptions with a primary focus on 'end-of-pipe' solutions. The outcomes of a research study presented in the paper, which investigated relationships between water quality and six different land uses offer practical guidance in the planning of future urban developments. In terms of safeguarding water quality, high-density residential development which results in a relatively smaller footprint would be the preferred option. The research study outcomes bring into question a number of fundamental concepts and misconceptions routinely accepted in stormwater quality management. The research findings confirmed the need to move beyond customary structural measures and identified the key role that urban planning can play in safeguarding urban water environments.
城市化显著影响水环境,径流增加且水质恶化。水量影响的管理较为直接,但水质影响要复杂得多。当前保障水质的方法大多无效,且受根深蒂固的误解所引导,主要侧重于“末端治理”解决方案。本文所呈现的一项研究成果,调查了水质与六种不同土地利用之间的关系,为未来城市发展规划提供了实际指导。在保障水质方面, footprint相对较小的高密度住宅开发将是首选方案。该研究成果对雨水质量管理中一些通常被接受的基本概念和误解提出了质疑。研究结果证实,需要超越传统的结构性措施,并确定了城市规划在保障城市水环境方面可以发挥的关键作用。 (注:原文中“footprint”此处可能表述有误,结合语境推测可能是“占地面积”之类意思,但按要求未做修改。)