Fantuzzi E, Alves J G, Ambrosi P, Janzekovic H, Vartiainen E
ENEA, Radiation Protection Institute, via dei Colli 16, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;112(1):3-44. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch282.
A large number of standards are available for radiation protection and individual monitoring purposes. They are published by various organisations, international and national. Moreover, the increasing policy of "Quality" applied to individual monitoring requires the implementation of standards on Quality Assurance (QA) both in technical and management aspects of a dosimetric service. Implementation of standards is not mandatory; therefore, varying degrees of implementation can be found in different European countries. However, for a number of good reasons, a degree of harmonisation within the European Union (EU) of the requirements and procedures for individual monitoring would be desirable. Harmonisation as applied to dosimetric services does not mean that they should all follow exactly the same procedures, but that they should aim to meet the same general requirements, and their results should be comparable. This article aims to compile information on the use of all standards applied within individual monitoring practices, be it on the calibration of dosemeters or on the QA procedures to be applied to the overall dose evaluation process. Both "technical standards" and "quality standards" will be discussed. A list of documents of relevance to subjects such as recommendations and requirements in the field of individual monitoring, whose application could help in the harmonisation of procedures, will also be given. As it is agreed that implementation of quality standards is a relevant framework within which harmonisation can be achieved, guidance on the implementation of quality standards in a dosimetric service is given. Accreditation and approval of dosimetric services will be of relevance in the process of harmonisation of individual monitoring within the EU. In this article, a discussion of various procedures and the meaning of both forms of recognition is also provided. Although most of the text applies to the monitoring of internal and external exposure to ionising radiation, the emphasis of this practical guidance is on monitoring for external radiation with passive dosemeters.
有大量标准可用于辐射防护和个人监测目的。这些标准由各种国际和国家组织发布。此外,应用于个人监测的“质量”政策日益增加,要求在剂量测定服务的技术和管理方面都实施质量保证(QA)标准。标准的实施并非强制性的;因此,在不同的欧洲国家可以发现不同程度的实施情况。然而,出于一些充分的理由,欧盟(EU)内个人监测的要求和程序进行一定程度的协调将是可取的。剂量测定服务的协调并不意味着它们都应遵循完全相同的程序,而是意味着它们应旨在满足相同的一般要求,并且其结果应具有可比性。本文旨在汇编有关个人监测实践中应用的所有标准的使用信息,无论是剂量计的校准还是应用于整体剂量评估过程的QA程序。将讨论“技术标准”和“质量标准”。还将给出与个人监测领域的建议和要求等主题相关的文件清单,其应用有助于程序的协调。由于人们一致认为质量标准的实施是可以实现协调的相关框架,因此给出了剂量测定服务中质量标准实施的指南。剂量测定服务的认可和批准在欧盟内个人监测的协调过程中将具有相关性。本文还讨论了各种程序以及两种认可形式的含义。尽管本文的大部分内容适用于对电离辐射内外照射的监测,但本实用指南的重点是使用被动剂量计进行外照射监测。