Saltvedt Ingvild, Saltnes Turi, Mo Ellen-Sofie Opdahl, Fayers Peter, Kaasa Stein, Sletvold Olav
Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004 Aug;16(4):300-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03324555.
In a previous publication, we showed that treatment of acutely sick, frail elderly patients in a Geriatric Evaluation and Management Unit (GEMU) reduced mortality considerably when compared with the general Medical Wards (MW). The aim of this presentation was to study the impact of treatment in a GEMU on health care utilization.
Acutely sick, frail patients, 75 years or older, who had been admitted as emergencies to the Department of Internal Medicine were randomized either to treatment in the GEMU (n=127) or to continued treatment in the MW (n=127). While usual treatment was given in the MW, the GEMU emphasized interdisciplinary and comprehensive assessment of all relevant disorders, early mobilization/rehabilitation, and discharge planning. After discharge from hospital, no specific follow-up was offered to any of the groups.
Of all subjects, 101 (80%) GEMU and 79 (64%) MW patients were still living in their own homes at three months (p=0.005); at six months the number was 91 (72%) and 74 (60%) (p=0.04) respectively. Median length of index stay was 19 days in the GEMU and 13 days in the MW group (p<0.001). After the initial stay, there were no statistically significant differences in admissions to or time spent in institutions.
The results indicate the overall positive treatment effect of acutely sick, frail elderly in a GEMU, i.e. patients treated in the GEMU had increased possibilities of living in their own homes, an effect that was mainly related to considerably reduced mortality in the GEMU group.
在之前的一篇出版物中,我们表明,与普通内科病房(MW)相比,在老年评估与管理单元(GEMU)对急性病、体弱的老年患者进行治疗可显著降低死亡率。本报告的目的是研究在GEMU进行治疗对医疗保健利用的影响。
75岁及以上因急症入住内科的急性病、体弱患者被随机分为在GEMU治疗组(n = 127)或在MW继续治疗组(n = 127)。MW进行常规治疗,而GEMU强调对所有相关疾病进行多学科综合评估、早期活动/康复及出院计划。出院后,两组均未接受特定随访。
在所有受试者中,101名(80%)GEMU患者和79名(64%)MW患者在三个月时仍居住在自己家中(p = 0.005);六个月时,这一数字分别为91名(72%)和74名(60%)(p = 0.04)。GEMU组首次住院的中位时长为19天,MW组为13天(p < 0.001)。首次住院后,在机构的入院率或住院时长方面无统计学显著差异。
结果表明在GEMU对急性病、体弱的老年人进行治疗具有总体积极效果,即在GEMU接受治疗的患者居家生活的可能性增加,这一效果主要与GEMU组死亡率显著降低有关。