Suppr超能文献

头部常规系列计算机断层扫描是否会影响创伤性脑损伤的治疗?一项前瞻性评估。

Does routine serial computed tomography of the head influence management of traumatic brain injury? A prospective evaluation.

作者信息

Brown Carlos V R, Weng Janie, Oh Daniel, Salim Ali, Kasotakis Georgios, Demetriades Demetrios, Velmahos George C, Rhee Peter

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2004 Nov;57(5):939-43. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000149492.92558.03.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) of the head is the current standard for diagnosing intracranial pathology following blunt head trauma. It is common practice to repeat the head CT to evaluate any progression of injury. Recent retrospective reviews have challenged the need for serial head CT after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study intends to prospectively examine the value of routine serial head CT after TBI.

METHODS

Consecutive adult blunt trauma patients with an abnormal head CT admitted to an urban, Level I trauma center from January 2003 to September 2003 were prospectively studied. Variables collected included: initial head CT results, indication for repeat head CT (routine versus neurologic change), number and results of repeat head CT scans, and clinical interventions following repeat head CT.

RESULTS

Over the 9-month period, there were 128 patients admitted with an abnormal head CT after sustaining blunt trauma. The 16 patients who died within 24 hours and the 12 patients who went directly to craniotomy were excluded. The remaining 100 patients make up the study population. Abnormal head CT findings were subarachnoid hemorrhage (47%), intraparenchymal hemorrhage (37%), subdural hematoma (28%), contusion (14%), epidural hematoma (11%), intraventricular hemorrhage (3%), and diffuse axonal injury (2%). Overall, 32 patients (32%) had only the admission head CT, while 68 patients (68%) underwent 90 repeat CT scans. Of the repeat head CT scans, 81 (90%) were performed on a routine basis without neurologic change. The remaining 9 (10%) were performed for a change in Glasgow Coma Scale (n = 5), change in intracranial pressure (n = 1), change in Glasgow Coma Scale and intracranial pressure (n = 1), change in pupil size (n = 1), or sudden appearance of a headache (n = 1). Three patients had their care altered after repeat head CT: two underwent craniotomy and one was started on barbiturate therapy. All three patients had their repeat head CT after neurologic change (decrease in Glasgow Coma Scale in 2 and increase in intracranial pressure in 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Serial head CT is common after TBI. Most repeat head CT scans are performed on a routine basis without neurologic change. Few patients with TBI have their management altered after repeat head CT, and these patients have neurologic deterioration before the repeat head CT. The use of routine serial head CT in patients without neurologic deterioration is not supported by the findings of this study.

摘要

背景

头部计算机断层扫描(CT)是目前钝性头部外伤后诊断颅内病变的标准方法。重复进行头部CT以评估损伤的任何进展是常见的做法。最近的回顾性研究对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后进行系列头部CT的必要性提出了质疑。本研究旨在前瞻性地探讨TBI后常规系列头部CT的价值。

方法

对2003年1月至2003年9月入住城市一级创伤中心、头部CT异常的连续成年钝性创伤患者进行前瞻性研究。收集的变量包括:初始头部CT结果、重复头部CT的指征(常规与神经功能变化)、重复头部CT扫描的次数和结果,以及重复头部CT后的临床干预措施。

结果

在9个月期间,有128例钝性创伤后头部CT异常的患者入院。排除24小时内死亡的16例患者和直接进行开颅手术的12例患者。其余100例患者构成研究人群。头部CT异常表现为蛛网膜下腔出血(47%)、脑实质内出血(37%)、硬膜下血肿(28%)、挫伤(14%)、硬膜外血肿(11%)、脑室内出血(3%)和弥漫性轴索损伤(2%)。总体而言,32例患者(32%)仅进行了入院时的头部CT检查,而68例患者(68%)接受了90次重复CT扫描。在重复头部CT扫描中,81次(90%)是在无神经功能变化的情况下常规进行的。其余9次(10%)是因格拉斯哥昏迷量表变化(n = 5)、颅内压变化(n = 1)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表和颅内压变化(n = 1)、瞳孔大小变化(n = 1)或突然出现头痛(n = 1)而进行的。3例患者在重复头部CT后护理措施发生改变:2例接受了开颅手术,1例开始使用巴比妥类药物治疗。所有3例患者在神经功能变化后(2例格拉斯哥昏迷量表下降,1例颅内压升高)进行了重复头部CT检查。

结论

TBI后系列头部CT检查很常见。大多数重复头部CT扫描是在无神经功能变化的情况下常规进行的。很少有TBI患者在重复头部CT后护理措施发生改变,且这些患者在重复头部CT前有神经功能恶化。本研究结果不支持对无神经功能恶化的患者使用常规系列头部CT检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验