Hill E Patricia, Stiles P J, Reyes Jared, Nold R Joseph, Helmer Stephen D, Haan James M
From the Department of Surgery (E.P.H., P.J.S., J.R., R.J.N., S.D.H., J.M.H.), The University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita; and Departments of Trauma Services (R.J.N., J.M.H.) and Medical Education (S.D.H.), Via Christi Hospital St. Francis, Wichita, Kansas.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 May;82(5):896-900. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001406.
Children with confirmed brain injury usually undergo follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan of the head within 24 hours of admission. To date, no evidence exists to validate the diagnostic or therapeutic value of these repeat CTs. The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate progression of traumatic brain injuries, (2) determine if routine repeat imaging changes management, and (3) compare the efficacy of recognizing worsening hemorrhage with serial neurological examination versus repeat imaging.
A 5-year retrospective review was conducted of all patients aged under 18 years with blunt traumatic head injury (n = 95). Data included demographics, type and size of intracranial hemorrhage, exam findings, diagnostic and management changes, and hospital outcomes.
Most patients (68.4%) had at least one repeat CT; of these, 67.7% (n = 44) showed no change or reduced hemorrhage. In only one patient did a repeat CT scan result in a surgical procedure; however, that CT scan was prompted by a change in neurological status. Among patients with more than two repeat head CTs, 42.9% led to a change in management, most frequently an additional CT scan. Presence of neurological symptoms was associated with having repeat CT scans (p = 0.025). Changes in Glasgow Coma Scale score were associated with increased hemorrhage (p = 0.012) but not repeat scans (p = 0.496). In the majority of cases, increased hemorrhage only resulted in an additional head CT and prolonged intensive care unit stay. Excluding patients who arrived with brain death, there was no difference in mortality between patients with and without repeat imaging.
Findings from this study support a selective approach for repeating head CTs with emphasis on changes in neurological symptoms and Glasgow Coma Scale score. Prospective studies on timing and indications for repeat CT scans are needed to support development of clinical guidelines.
Therapeutic study, level III.
确诊脑损伤的儿童通常在入院后24小时内接受头部随访计算机断层扫描(CT)。迄今为止,尚无证据证实这些重复CT扫描的诊断或治疗价值。本研究的目的是:(1)评估创伤性脑损伤的进展情况;(2)确定常规重复成像是否会改变治疗方案;(3)比较连续神经学检查与重复成像在识别出血加重方面的效果。
对所有18岁以下钝性颅脑损伤患者(n = 95)进行了为期5年的回顾性研究。数据包括人口统计学资料、颅内出血的类型和大小、检查结果、诊断和治疗方案的改变以及医院结局。
大多数患者(68.4%)至少进行了一次重复CT检查;其中,67.7%(n = 44)的检查结果显示无变化或出血减少。只有1例患者的重复CT扫描结果导致了手术治疗;然而,该CT扫描是由神经学状态的改变所引发的。在接受了两次以上重复头部CT检查的患者中,42.9%的检查结果导致了治疗方案的改变,最常见的是额外进行一次CT扫描。神经学症状的出现与进行重复CT扫描相关(p = 0.025)。格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的变化与出血增加相关(p = 0.012),但与重复扫描无关(p = 0.496)。在大多数情况下,出血增加仅导致额外进行一次头部CT检查以及延长重症监护病房的住院时间。排除入院时即脑死亡的患者后,进行重复成像和未进行重复成像的患者在死亡率方面没有差异。
本研究结果支持采用选择性方法进行重复头部CT检查,重点关注神经学症状和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的变化。需要进行关于重复CT扫描的时间和指征的前瞻性研究,以支持临床指南的制定。
治疗性研究,III级。