• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结肠切除术与开腹结肠切除术治疗结肠癌:对随访至少4年的患者进行的回顾性分析

Laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy for colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of patients followed up for at least 4 years.

作者信息

Kojima Masayuki, Konishi Fumio, Okada Masaki, Nagai Hideo

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical School, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Minamikawachi-machi, Tochigi 329-0434, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2004;34(12):1020-4. doi: 10.1007/s00595-004-2866-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00595-004-2866-6
PMID:15580385
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the long-term outcome of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC) with that of open colectomy (OC) for carcinoma in patients followed up for a minimum of 4 years.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 118 patients who underwent LAC between January 1993 and September 1999, and compared the results with those of 163 selected patients who underwent OC during the same period.

RESULTS

Curative surgery was performed in 114 of the LAC patients. Because recurrence did not develop in any of the patients with stage I cancer, we analyzed the patterns of recurrence only in those with stage II or III disease; 58 patients were analyzed in the laparoscopic group and 130 in the open colectomy group. In the LAC group, 7 (12.1%) patients had recurrence after a median follow-up of 58 months and in the OC group, 19 (14.6%) patients had recurrence after a median follow-up of 56.5 months. The 5-year disease-free rate was similar in the LAC (87.8%) and OC (85.5%) groups (P = 0.75 by the log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy is effective and safe for the treatment of colorectal carcinomas under the criteria used in this study. However, further validation of these results is recommended.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术(LAC)与开腹结肠切除术(OC)治疗结肠癌患者的长期疗效,随访时间至少为4年。

方法

我们回顾了1993年1月至1999年9月期间接受LAC的118例患者的病历,并将结果与同期接受OC的163例选定患者的结果进行比较。

结果

114例LAC患者接受了根治性手术。由于I期癌症患者均未出现复发,我们仅分析了II期或III期疾病患者的复发模式;腹腔镜组分析了58例患者,开腹结肠切除术组分析了130例患者。在LAC组中,中位随访58个月后,7例(12.1%)患者出现复发,在OC组中,中位随访56.5个月后,19例(14.6%)患者出现复发。LAC组(87.8%)和OC组(85.5%)的5年无病生存率相似(对数秩检验P = 0.75)。

结论

在本研究使用的标准下,腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术治疗结直肠癌有效且安全。然而,建议对这些结果进行进一步验证。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy for colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of patients followed up for at least 4 years.腹腔镜结肠切除术与开腹结肠切除术治疗结肠癌:对随访至少4年的患者进行的回顾性分析
Surg Today. 2004;34(12):1020-4. doi: 10.1007/s00595-004-2866-6.
2
Open colectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted colectomy supported by hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy for resectable colorectal cancer: a comparative study with minimum follow-up of three years.开腹结肠切除术与手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术支持的腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术治疗可切除结直肠癌的比较研究:一项至少随访三年的对比研究
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jul-Aug;56(93):998-1006.
3
Oncologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open surgery for advanced colorectal cancer.晚期结直肠癌腹腔镜手术与开放手术的肿瘤学结局
Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 Sep-Oct;48(41):1248-51.
4
Colorectal carcinoma: laparoscopic versus traditional open surgery. A clinical trial.结直肠癌:腹腔镜手术与传统开放手术对比。一项临床试验。
Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 Mar-Apr;46(26):900-4.
5
Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States.美国腹腔镜辅助结肠癌切除术的应用及结果
Arch Surg. 2008 Sep;143(9):832-9; discussion 839-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.9.832.
6
The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer.腹腔镜辅助手术与开放手术治疗结肠癌的随机临床试验的长期结果
Ann Surg. 2008 Jul;248(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816a9d65.
7
Laparoscopic versus conventional palliative resection for incurable, symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer: impact on short-term results.腹腔镜手术与传统姑息性切除术治疗无法治愈的有症状的IV期结直肠癌:对短期结果的影响
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):184-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821db75e.
8
Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations.腹腔镜与传统开放结直肠手术后的手术失血量及血制品使用情况
Arch Surg. 2004 Jan;139(1):39-42. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.1.39.
9
Benefits of laparoscopy: does the disease condition that indicated colectomy matter?腹腔镜检查的益处:需要行结肠切除术的疾病状况重要吗?
Am Surg. 2011 May;77(5):527-33.
10
Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases.直肠腺癌腹腔镜前切除术的结果:157例回顾性分析
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: intermediate results.单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:中期结果
JSLS. 2013 Jan-Mar;17(1):5-8. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13517013316997.
2
Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: current knowledge and what remains unclear.腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的长期疗效:现有知识与未解之谜。
Surg Today. 2010;40(2):97-101. doi: 10.1007/s00595-009-4133-3. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
3
Effects of hospital and surgeon volumes on operating times, postoperative complications, and length of stay following laparoscopic colectomy.
腹腔镜结肠切除术的手术时间、术后并发症和住院时间与医院和外科医生手术量的关系。
Surg Today. 2009;39(11):955-61. doi: 10.1007/s00595-008-4052-8. Epub 2009 Nov 1.
4
Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections for cancer in 235 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.235例癌症患者接受腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌切除术的长期结果,最短随访5年。
Surg Endosc. 2006 Apr;20(4):546-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0338-8. Epub 2006 Feb 27.