Richard B, Launay-Iliadis M C, Iliadis A, Just-Landi S, Blaise D, Stoppa A M, Viens P, Gaspard M H, Maraninchi D, Cano J P
INSERM U278, Faculté de Pharmacie, Marseille, France.
Br J Cancer. 1992 Mar;65(3):399-404. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1992.81.
We have studied the pharmacokinetics of mitoxantrone in cancer patients. Two regimens were used: eight women (10 kinetics) received a 10 min i.v. infusion of 12 mg m-2 of mitoxantrone; seven women (seven kinetics) received high-dose mitoxantrone associated to high-dose alkylating agents and underwent autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT). High-dose mitoxantrone was administered according to two different protocols. The drug was quantified in plasma with an HPLC assay and pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with the APIS software. Mitoxantrone pharmacokinetics were best described by an open two- (six kinetics) or an open three compartment model (11 kinetics). A large interindivual variability was observed in pharmacokinetic parameters. In the first group of patients, mean +/- s.d. values of clearance, half-life and total distribution volume were 21.41 +/- 14.59 1 h-1, 19.83 +/- 23.95 h, 165.89 +/- 134.75 1 respectively. In the high-dose group, these values were 21.68 +/- 7.30 1 h-1, 50.26 +/- 20.62 h, 413.70 +/- 194.81 1 respectively. Results showed that identification through the open 2-compartment model is certainly related to the small number of late time-points. We therefore think that mitoxantrone pharmacokinetics is generally best described by an open 3-compartment model. Clearance values showed that there was no saturation in mitoxantrone elimination, even at the highest doses. Terminal elimination half-life was probably underestimated because of the lack of late time-points in some kinetics. The half-life is long for patients receiving high-dose mitoxantrone (mean value was 50 h) and it would be hazardous to perform BMT too early after mitoxantrone infusion. Mitoxantrone metabolites were detected in the plasma of five patients receiving high-dose mitoxantrone and in one with hepatic impairment.
我们研究了米托蒽醌在癌症患者中的药代动力学。采用了两种方案:8名女性(10次药代动力学研究)接受了10分钟静脉输注,剂量为12mg/m²的米托蒽醌;7名女性(7次药代动力学研究)接受了与大剂量烷化剂联合使用的大剂量米托蒽醌,并进行了自体骨髓移植(BMT)。大剂量米托蒽醌根据两种不同方案给药。采用高效液相色谱法测定血浆中的药物含量,并使用APIS软件进行药代动力学分析。米托蒽醌的药代动力学最适合用开放二室模型(6次药代动力学研究)或开放三室模型(11次药代动力学研究)来描述。药代动力学参数存在较大的个体间差异。在第一组患者中,清除率、半衰期和总分布容积的均值±标准差分别为21.41±14.59 l/h、19.83±23.95 h、165.89±134.75 l。在大剂量组中,这些值分别为21.68±7.30 l/h、50.26±20.62 h、413.70±194.81 l。结果表明,通过开放二室模型进行识别肯定与晚期时间点数量较少有关。因此,我们认为米托蒽醌的药代动力学通常最好用开放三室模型来描述。清除率值表明,即使在最高剂量下,米托蒽醌的消除也未出现饱和。由于某些药代动力学研究中缺乏晚期时间点,终末消除半衰期可能被低估。接受大剂量米托蒽醌患者的半衰期较长(均值为50小时),在米托蒽醌输注后过早进行BMT可能存在危险。在5名接受大剂量米托蒽醌的患者和1名肝功能损害患者的血浆中检测到了米托蒽醌代谢产物。