Lautze Sue, Leaning Jennifer, Raven-Roberts Angela, Kent Randolph, Mazurana Dyan
Hertford College, Oxford OX1 3BW, UK.
Lancet. 2004;364(9451):2134-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17555-7.
This article presents an introduction to the causes and characteristics of armed conflicts. It reviews some of the key humanitarian crises that broke new ground in terms of the technologies and practices that developed at the field level in response to each new complex emergency, with particular focus on the health sector. It introduces the concept of humanitarian governance as a framework for addressing the consequences and implications of the failure of worldwide governance for the protection of civilians in armed conflict. Here, we term humanitarian governance to include the use of international humanitarian law and human rights instruments to govern the behaviour of state and non-state organisations in conflict zones in a way that protects the lives and livelihoods of affected populations. We note, however, that terrorist concerns appear to be replacing humanitarian logic in the network of worldwide governance.
本文介绍了武装冲突的起因和特点。它回顾了一些关键的人道主义危机,这些危机在应对每一次新的复杂紧急情况时,在实地层面所发展出的技术和实践方面开创了新局面,尤其侧重于卫生部门。它引入了人道主义治理的概念,将其作为一个框架,以应对全球治理失败给武装冲突中平民保护带来的后果和影响。在此,我们所说的人道主义治理包括利用国际人道法和人权文书,以保护受影响民众生命和生计的方式,来管控冲突地区国家和非国家组织的行为。然而,我们注意到,在全球治理网络中,恐怖主义担忧似乎正在取代人道主义逻辑。