Steg Philippe Gabriel, Thuaire Christophe, Himbert Dominique, Carrié Didier, Champagne Stéphane, Coisne Damien, Khalifé Khalife, Cazaux Pierre, Logeart Damien, Slama Michel, Spaulding Christian, Cohen Ariel, Tirouvanziam Ashok, Montély Jean-Michel, Rodriguez Rosa-Maria, Garbarz Eric, Wijns William, Durand-Zaleski Isabelle, Porcher Raphaël, Brucker Lionel, Chevret Sylvie, Chastang Claude
Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Bichat, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75877 Paris Cedex 18, France.
Eur Heart J. 2004 Dec;25(24):2187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.10.019.
To determine whether late recanalization of an occluded infarct artery after acute myocardial infarction is beneficial.
Two hundred and twelve patients with a first Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) and an occluded infarct vessel were enrolled. After coronary and left ventricular contrast angiography, patients were randomized to percutaneous revascularization (PTCA, n=109), carried out 2-15 days after symptom onset or medical therapy (n=103). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal MI, or ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The majority had single-vessel disease and less than one-third had involvement of the left anterior descending artery. The use of pharmacological therapy was high in both groups. At six months, left ventricular ejection fraction was 5% higher in the invasive compared with the medical group (P=0.013) and more patients had a patent artery (82.8% vs 34.2%, P<0.0001). Restenosis was seen in 49.4% of patients in the PTCA group. At a mean of 34 months of follow-up, the occurrence of the primary endpoint was similar in the medical and PTCA groups (8.7% vs 7.3% respectively, P=0.68), but the overall costs were higher for PTCA. The secondary endpoint combining the primary endpoint with admission for heart failure was also similar between groups (12.6% vs 10.1% in the medical and PTCA groups, respectively, P=0.56).
Systematic late PTCA of the infarct vessel was associated with a higher left ventricular ejection fraction at six months, no difference in clinical outcomes, and higher costs than medical therapy. These results must be interpreted with caution given the small size and low risk of the population.
确定急性心肌梗死后梗死动脉的延迟再通是否有益。
纳入212例首次发生Q波心肌梗死(MI)且梗死血管闭塞的患者。在进行冠状动脉和左心室造影后,患者被随机分为经皮血管重建术组(PTCA,n = 109),于症状发作后2 - 15天进行,或药物治疗组(n = 103)。主要终点是心脏性死亡、非致命性MI或室性快速心律失常的复合终点。大多数患者为单支血管病变,不到三分之一的患者累及左前降支动脉。两组药物治疗的使用率都很高。六个月时,与药物治疗组相比,侵入性治疗组的左心室射血分数高5%(P = 0.013),且更多患者的动脉保持通畅(82.8%对34.2%,P < 0.0001)。PTCA组49.4%的患者出现再狭窄。在平均34个月的随访中,药物治疗组和PTCA组主要终点的发生率相似(分别为8.7%和7.3%,P = 0.68),但PTCA的总体费用更高。将主要终点与因心力衰竭入院相结合的次要终点在两组之间也相似(药物治疗组和PTCA组分别为12.6%和10.1%,P = 0.56)。
梗死血管的系统性延迟PTCA与六个月时较高的左心室射血分数相关,临床结局无差异,但费用高于药物治疗。鉴于研究人群规模小且风险低,这些结果必须谨慎解读。