Helsen Lieve, Van den Bulck Eric
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Celestijnenlaan 300A, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
Environ Pollut. 2005 Mar;134(2):301-14. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.07.025.
Several alternative methods for the disposal of chromated copper arsenate (CCA) treated wood waste have been studied in the literature, and these methods are reviewed and compared in this paper. Alternative disposal methods include: recycling and recovery, chemical extraction, bioremediation, electrodialytic remediation and thermal destruction. Thermochemical conversion processes are evaluated in detail based on experiments with model compounds as well as experimental and modelling work with CCA treated wood. The latter category includes: determination of the percentage of arsenic volatilised during thermal conversion of CCA treated wood, identification of the mechanisms responsible for arsenic release, modelling of high temperature equilibrium chemistry involved when CCA treated wood is burned, overview of options available for arsenic capture, characterisation of ash resulting from (co-)combustion of CCA treated wood, concerns about polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/furans (PCDD/F) formation. Finally, the most appropriate thermochemical disposal technology is identified on short term (co-incineration) and on long term (low-temperature pyrolysis or high-temperature gasification).
文献中研究了几种处理铬酸铜砷(CCA)处理过的木材废料的替代方法,本文对这些方法进行了综述和比较。替代处置方法包括:回收利用、化学萃取、生物修复、电渗析修复和热破坏。基于模型化合物的实验以及对CCA处理过的木材的实验和建模工作,对热化学转化过程进行了详细评估。后一类包括:测定CCA处理过的木材热转化过程中挥发的砷的百分比、确定砷释放的机制、模拟CCA处理过的木材燃烧时涉及的高温平衡化学、概述砷捕获的可用选项、表征CCA处理过的木材(共)燃烧产生的灰分、对多氯二苯并对二恶英/呋喃(PCDD/F)形成的担忧。最后,确定了短期(共焚烧)和长期(低温热解或高温气化)最合适的热化学处置技术。