Quaney Barbara M, Nudo Randolph J, Cole Kelly J
170A Landon Center on Aging, Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3599 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Apr;93(4):2021-7. doi: 10.1152/jn.00599.2004. Epub 2004 Dec 8.
We examined if object information obtained during one prehension task is used to produce fingertip forces for handling the same object in a different prehension task. Our observations address the task specificity of the internal models presumed to issue commands for grasping and transporting objects. Two groups participated in a 2-day experiment in which they lifted a novel object (230 g; 1.2 g/cm3). On Day One, the high force group (HFG) lifted the object by applying 10 N of grip force prior to applying vertical lift force. This disrupted the usual coordination of grip and lift forces and represented a higher grip force than necessary. The self-selected force group (SSFG) lifted the object on Day One with no instructions regarding their grip or lift forces. They first generated grip forces of 5.8 N, which decreased to 2.6 N by the 10th lift. Four hours later, they lifted the same object in the manner of the HFG. On Day Two, both groups lifted the same object "naturally and comfortably" with the opposite hand. The SSFG began Day Two using a grip force of 2.5 N, consistent with the acquisition of an accurate object representation during Day One. The HFG began Day Two using accurately scaled lift forces, but produced grip forces that virtually replicated those of the SSFG on Day One. We concur with recent suggestions that separate, independently adapted internal models produce grip and lift commands. The object representation that scaled lift force was not available to scale grip force. Furthermore, the concept of a general-purpose object representation that is available across prehension tasks was not supported.
我们研究了在一项抓握任务中获得的物体信息是否用于在另一项抓握任务中产生用于操作同一物体的指尖力。我们的观察结果涉及假定为发出抓握和运输物体指令的内部模型的任务特异性。两组参与了一项为期两天的实验,在实验中他们举起一个新物体(230克;1.2克/立方厘米)。在第一天,高力组(HFG)在施加垂直举力之前先施加10牛的握力来举起物体。这打乱了握力和举力的通常协调,并且代表了比必要时更高的握力。自选力组(SSFG)在第一天举起物体时没有关于其握力或举力的指示。他们首先产生5.8牛的握力,到第10次举起时降至2.6牛。四小时后,他们以高力组的方式举起同一物体。在第二天,两组都用另一只手“自然舒适地”举起同一物体。自选力组在第二天开始时使用2.5牛的握力,这与第一天获得准确的物体表征一致。高力组在第二天开始时使用精确缩放的举力,但产生的握力实际上与自选力组第一天的握力相同。我们赞同最近的观点,即单独的、独立适应的内部模型产生握力和举力指令。缩放举力的物体表征无法用于缩放握力。此外,跨抓握任务可用的通用物体表征的概念未得到支持。