Suppr超能文献

通过实时聚合酶链反应和传统聚合酶链反应检测泌尿生殖系统标本中的生殖支原体。

Detection of Mycoplasma genitalium in urogenital specimens by real-time PCR and by conventional PCR assay.

作者信息

Jurstrand Margaretha, Jensen Jørgen Skov, Fredlund Hans, Falk Lars, Mölling Paula

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology1, Outpatient Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic, Department of Dermatovenereology3, and Clinical Research Centre4, Örebro University Hospital, SE-70185 Örebro, Sweden 2Mycoplasma Laboratory, Department of Respiratory Infections, Meningitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 2005 Jan;54(Pt 1):23-29. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45732-0.

Abstract

A real-time LightCycler PCR (LC-PCR) with hybridization probes for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium in endocervical and first void urine specimens was developed and compared to a conventional PCR. The primers for both assays were identical and designed to amplify a 427 bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene of M. genitalium. The LC-PCR assay had a detection limit of < 5 bacterial genomes per reaction when dilutions of genomic DNA from a type strain of M. genitalium were tested. First void urine from 398 men and first void urine and endocervical specimens from 301 women attending an STD clinic were analysed by LC-PCR and by the conventional PCR. Using the conventional PCR as reference, the LC-PCR had a specificity of 99.7 % and a sensitivity of 72.2 % for the detection of M. genitalium in first void urine samples from men. There was no significant difference in the performance of the LC-PCR assay compared to the conventional PCR when endocervical swabs were considered (58 and 65 %, respectively) or with a set of endocervical swab/urine specimens for which the LC-PCR assay detected 73 % of the infections (specificity = 98.6 % and sensitivity = 68.2 %) while the conventional PCR detected 85 % of the infections. With female urine specimens there was a significant difference between the two assays (38 and 73 %, respectively; P = 0.01 McNemar's test). This illustrates the need to analyse both endocervical and urine specimens, because M. genitalium DNA was detected in only one of the two specimens in a great number of the M. genitalium-infected women. The lower sensitivity of the LC-PCR assay was probably caused by a combination of inhibition and limitations regarding the amount of template DNA. The LC-PCR assay was easy to perform and the simultaneous amplification and detection eliminated the need for further handling of PCR products. With improvement in sample preparation methods and increased volumes of the template DNA, the LC-PCR assay could be a useful routine diagnostic method.

摘要

开发了一种用于检测宫颈内膜和首次晨尿样本中生殖支原体的带有杂交探针的实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(LC-PCR),并将其与传统聚合酶链反应进行比较。两种检测方法的引物相同,均设计用于扩增生殖支原体16S rRNA基因的427 bp片段。当检测来自生殖支原体标准菌株的基因组DNA稀释液时,LC-PCR检测限为每个反应<5个细菌基因组。对398名男性的首次晨尿以及301名到性传播疾病诊所就诊的女性的首次晨尿和宫颈内膜样本进行了LC-PCR和传统PCR分析。以传统PCR为参照,LC-PCR检测男性首次晨尿样本中生殖支原体的特异性为99.7%,灵敏度为72.2%。当考虑宫颈拭子样本时(分别为58%和65%),或者对于一组宫颈拭子/尿液样本,LC-PCR检测到73%的感染(特异性=98.6%,灵敏度=68.2%),而传统PCR检测到85%的感染,此时LC-PCR检测方法与传统PCR的性能无显著差异。对于女性尿液样本,两种检测方法存在显著差异(分别为38%和73%;P = 0.01,McNemar检验)。这表明需要同时分析宫颈内膜和尿液样本,因为在大量感染生殖支原体的女性中,仅在两份样本中的一份检测到了生殖支原体DNA。LC-PCR检测方法较低的灵敏度可能是由模板DNA量的抑制作用和局限性共同导致的。LC-PCR检测方法易于操作,同时进行扩增和检测无需对PCR产物进行进一步处理。随着样本制备方法的改进和模板DNA量的增加,LC-PCR检测方法可能会成为一种有用的常规诊断方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验