Reed Bruce R, Mungas Dan M, Kramer Joel H, Betz Brian P, Ellis William, Vinters Harry V, Zarow Chris, Jagust William J, Chui Helena C
Alzheimer's Disease Center, University of California, Davis 94553, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 Feb;18(1):63-74. doi: 10.1080/13854040490507163.
Studies reporting that ischemic vascular dementia (IVD), compared to Alzheimer's disease (AD), is associated with relatively greater impairment of executive function and relatively preserved episodic memory raise the question of whether there is a distinctive neuropsychological profile of impairment associated with IVD and whether this might be useful in clinical diagnosis. However, prior reports are almost all based on clinically diagnosed cases, raising obvious issues of possible circularity and leaving unanswered questions of validity. Here we report on clinical and neuropsychological findings in 18 prospectively studied cases that had substantial pathology-defined cerebrovascular disease (CVD) at autopsy. Nine cases had minimal AD pathology, while the remainder had moderate or severe degrees of AD pathology. Cognitive status at last evaluation ranged from mild cognitive impairment to moderate dementia. Clinical features were quite variable; only 40% of cases with high CVD levels had elevated Hachinski Ischemia Scale scores and neither abrupt onset nor stepwise progression was found in most high CVD cases, even when AD changes were essentially absent. The presence of dementia was predictably related to the level of neurofibrillary pathology, but was not related to the severity of CVD. Neuropsychologists expert in the evaluation of dementia used a priori criteria to diagnose neuropsychological protocols (blind to all other data) from cases with pathology-informed diagnoses of AD, IVD, and mixed dementia. Sensitivity and specificity were both high for AD, sensitivity for detecting pure IVD was poor, and values were intermediate for detecting IVD irrespective of AD levels. A illustrative case example is included. We conclude that the profile of cognitive impairment in IVD is highly variable, but that in clinical settings neuropsychological readings may contribute to the differential diagnosis of dementia.
研究报告称,与阿尔茨海默病(AD)相比,缺血性血管性痴呆(IVD)与执行功能相对更严重受损及情景记忆相对保留有关,这就引发了一个问题,即是否存在与IVD相关的独特神经心理学损伤特征,以及这在临床诊断中是否有用。然而,先前的报告几乎都基于临床诊断病例,这就产生了明显的可能循环论证问题,且有效性问题也未得到解答。在此,我们报告了18例前瞻性研究病例的临床和神经心理学发现,这些病例在尸检时有大量病理确诊的脑血管疾病(CVD)。9例有轻微AD病理改变,其余病例有中度或重度AD病理改变。最后一次评估时的认知状态范围从轻度认知障碍到中度痴呆。临床特征差异很大;CVD水平高的病例中只有40%的Hachinski缺血量表得分升高,而且在大多数CVD水平高的病例中未发现急性起病或阶梯式进展,即使基本不存在AD改变。痴呆的存在与神经原纤维病理水平有可预测的相关性,但与CVD的严重程度无关。擅长痴呆评估的神经心理学家使用先验标准,对经病理确诊为AD、IVD和混合性痴呆的病例的神经心理学方案进行诊断(对所有其他数据不知情)。AD的敏感性和特异性都很高,检测纯IVD的敏感性较差,检测与AD水平无关的IVD时,各项值处于中间水平。文中包含一个说明性病例。我们得出结论,IVD中的认知损伤特征高度可变,但在临床环境中,神经心理学检查结果可能有助于痴呆的鉴别诊断。