Kilbourne Amy M, Schulberg Herbert C, Post Edward P, Rollman Bruce L, Belnap Bea Herbeck, Pincus Harold Alan
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA.
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):631-59. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00326.x.
Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using treatment models for major depression in primary care settings. Nonetheless, translating these models into enduring changes in routine primary care has proved difficult. Various health system and organizational barriers prevent the integration of these models into primary care settings. This article discusses barriers to introducing and sustaining evidence-based depression management services in community-based primary care practices and suggests organizational and financial solutions based on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Depression in Primary Care Program. It focuses on strategies to improve depression care in medical settings based on adaptations of the chronic care model and discusses the challenges of implementing evidence-based depression care given the structural, financial, and cultural separation between mental health and general medical care.
随机对照试验已证明在初级保健环境中使用治疗模型治疗重度抑郁症的有效性和成本效益。尽管如此,将这些模型转化为常规初级保健中的持久变化已被证明是困难的。各种卫生系统和组织障碍阻碍了这些模型融入初级保健环境。本文讨论了在社区初级保健实践中引入和维持循证抑郁症管理服务的障碍,并基于罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会初级保健抑郁症项目提出了组织和财务解决方案。它重点介绍了基于慢性病护理模型改编的改善医疗环境中抑郁症护理的策略,并讨论了鉴于心理健康与普通医疗护理之间存在结构、财务和文化差异,实施循证抑郁症护理所面临的挑战。