• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Cancer Screening and Reduce Depression Among Low-Income Women.一项旨在提高低收入女性癌症筛查率并减轻其抑郁症状的随机对照试验。
J Prev Health Promot. 2022 Aug;3(3):271-299. doi: 10.1177/26320770221096098. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Integrating Cancer Screening and Mental Health Services in Primary Care: Protocol and Baseline Results of a Patient-Centered Outcomes Intervention Study.将癌症筛查与初级保健中的心理健康服务相结合:以患者为中心的结局干预研究的方案和基线结果。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(4):1907-1934. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0173.
4
Translation of an efficacious cancer-screening intervention to women enrolled in a Medicaid managed care organization.向参加医疗补助管理式医疗组织的女性推广有效的癌症筛查干预措施。
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):320-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.701.
5
6
Impact of Collaborative Care for Underserved Patients with PTSD in Primary Care: a Randomized Controlled Trial.基层医疗中为未得到充分服务的创伤后应激障碍患者提供协作护理的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 May;31(5):509-17. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3588-3. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
7
8
Can language-concordant prevention care managers improve cancer screening rates?使用语言一致的预防护理经理能否提高癌症筛查率?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Oct;16(10):2058-64. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0373.
9
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a multilevel, multicomponent intervention promoting colorectal cancer screening in health centers: a qualitative study of key informant perspectives.在健康中心实施多层次、多组分干预措施以促进结直肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:关键知情人观点的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10749-y.
10
Effect of Telephone-Delivered Collaborative Goal Setting and Behavioral Activation vs Enhanced Usual Care for Depression Among Adults With Uncontrolled Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.电话传递式协作目标设定和行为激活联合常规护理与强化常规护理对伴发未控制糖尿病的成年抑郁症患者的效果比较:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198634. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8634.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.支持女性进行乳腺癌筛查决策的共享决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 10;5(5):CD013822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013822.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating Cancer Screening and Mental Health Services in Primary Care: Protocol and Baseline Results of a Patient-Centered Outcomes Intervention Study.将癌症筛查与初级保健中的心理健康服务相结合:以患者为中心的结局干预研究的方案和基线结果。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(4):1907-1934. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0173.
2
Quality of life outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of patient navigation in Latina breast cancer survivors.一项针对拉丁裔乳腺癌幸存者的患者导航随机对照试验的生活质量结果。
Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(21):7837-7848. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3272. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
3
Effectiveness of Patient Navigation to Increase Cancer Screening in Populations Adversely Affected by Health Disparities: a Meta-analysis.患者导航对增加受健康差异负面影响人群癌症筛查的效果:一项荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):3026-3035. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06020-9. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
Addressing Disparities in Cancer Screening among U.S. Immigrants: Progress and Opportunities.解决美国移民癌症筛查中的差异:进展与机遇。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Mar;13(3):253-260. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0249.
5
Outcomes of a Multicomponent Culturally Tailored Cervical Cancer Screening Intervention Among Underserved Hispanic Women ().一项针对服务不足的西班牙裔女性的多组分文化定制宫颈癌筛查干预的结果()。
Health Promot Pract. 2021 Jan;22(1):112-121. doi: 10.1177/1524839919893309. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
6
Does poor mental health explain socio-demographic gradients in breast cancer screening uptake? A population-based study.心理健康状况不佳是否能解释乳腺癌筛查参与度的社会人口梯度?一项基于人群的研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;30(3):396-401. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz220.
7
Disparities in cancer screening in people with mental illness across the world versus the general population: prevalence and comparative meta-analysis including 4 717 839 people.全球精神疾病患者与普通人群在癌症筛查方面的差异:纳入4717839人的患病率及比较性荟萃分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;7(1):52-63. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30414-6. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
8
Assessing the effect of patient navigator assistance for psychosocial support services on health-related quality of life in a randomized clinical trial in Latino breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors.在一项针对拉丁裔乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌幸存者的随机临床试验中,评估患者导航员协助提供社会心理支持服务对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Cancer. 2020 Mar 1;126(5):1112-1123. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32626. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
9
Promoting colonoscopy screening among low-income Latinos at average risk of colorectal cancer: A randomized clinical trial.在结直肠癌平均风险的低收入拉丁裔人群中推广结肠镜筛查:一项随机临床试验。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 15;126(4):782-791. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32541. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
10
Decision Support and Navigation to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Hispanic Patients.决策支持和导航以提高西班牙裔患者的结直肠癌筛查率。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Feb;28(2):384-391. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0260. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

一项旨在提高低收入女性癌症筛查率并减轻其抑郁症状的随机对照试验。

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Cancer Screening and Reduce Depression Among Low-Income Women.

作者信息

Tobin Jonathan N, Weiss Elisa S, Cassells Andrea, Lin T J, Holder Tameir, Carrozzi Gianni, Barsanti Franco, Morales Alejandra, Mailing Alison, Espejo Maria, Gilbert Erica, Casiano Louann, O'Hara-Cicero Ellen, Weed John, Dietrich Allen J

机构信息

Clinical Directors Network (CDN), New York, NY, USA.

The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, White Plains, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Prev Health Promot. 2022 Aug;3(3):271-299. doi: 10.1177/26320770221096098. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1177/26320770221096098
PMID:38566802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10986328/
Abstract

Low-income women of color receive fewer cancer screenings and have higher rates of depression, which can interfere with cancer screening participation. This study assessed the comparative effectiveness of two interventions for improving colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening participation and reducing depression among underserved women in Bronx, NY, with depression. This comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial (RCT) with assessments at study entry, 6, and 12 months utilized an intent-to-treat statistical approach. Eligible women were aged 50 to 64, screened positive for depression, and were overdue for ≥ 1 cancer screening (colorectal, breast, and/or cervical). Participants were randomized to a collaborative depression care plus cancer screening intervention (CCI + PCM) or cancer screening intervention alone (PCM). Interventions were telephone-based, available in English or Spanish, delivered over 12 months, and facilitated by a skilled care manager. Cancer screening data were extracted from electronic health records. Depression was measured with a validated self-report instrument (PHQ-9). Seven hundred fifty seven women consented and were randomized (CCI + PCM, = 378; PCM, = 379). Analyses revealed statistically significant increases in up-to-date status for all three cancer screenings; depression improved in both intervention groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the interventions in improving cancer screening rates or reducing depression. CCI and PCM both improved breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening and depression in clinical settings in underserved communities; however, neither intervention showed an advantage in outcomes. Decisions about which approach to implement may depend on the nature of the practice and alignment of the interventions with other ongoing priorities and resources.

摘要

低收入有色人种女性接受的癌症筛查较少,且抑郁症发病率较高,这可能会影响她们参与癌症筛查。本研究评估了两种干预措施对提高纽约布朗克斯区未得到充分服务且患有抑郁症的女性的结直肠癌、乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查参与率以及减轻抑郁症的相对有效性。这项具有意向性治疗统计方法的比较有效性随机对照试验(RCT)在研究开始时、6个月和12个月时进行了评估。符合条件的女性年龄在50至64岁之间,抑郁症筛查呈阳性,且≥1项癌症筛查(结直肠癌、乳腺癌和/或宫颈癌)逾期未做。参与者被随机分为协作式抑郁症护理加癌症筛查干预组(CCI + PCM)或仅癌症筛查干预组(PCM)。干预措施通过电话进行,提供英语或西班牙语服务,为期12个月,并由一名熟练的护理经理提供协助。癌症筛查数据从电子健康记录中提取。抑郁症通过经过验证的自我报告工具(PHQ - 9)进行测量。757名女性同意参与并被随机分组(CCI + PCM组,n = 378;PCM组,n = 379)。分析显示,所有三种癌症筛查的最新状态均有统计学上的显著增加;两个干预组的抑郁症情况均有所改善。在提高癌症筛查率或减轻抑郁症方面,两种干预措施之间没有统计学上的显著差异。CCI和PCM在服务不足社区的临床环境中均改善了乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查以及抑郁症情况;然而,两种干预措施在结果方面均未显示出优势。关于采用哪种方法的决策可能取决于实践的性质以及干预措施与其他当前优先事项和资源的匹配情况。