Klein Dorie, Miller Robin E, Noble Amanda, Speiglman Richard
Public Health Institute, 555 12 Street, Oakland, CA 94607, USA.
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):723-57. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00329.x.
A major state drug abuse initiative, California's Proposition 36 of 2000, mandated that adults convicted of drug possession be offered treatment in lieu of incarceration. While the law expanded public treatment for arrestees, the counties were given discretion in structuring their systems of care and procedures to manage clients. Using data from a study of key informants in eight counties, this article examines local planning to increase drug treatment capacity and manage clients' access to treatment. In both these planning domains, it describes the counties' strategies and concerns, reasons for their differences in approaches, and whether and how this state initiative, which explicitly incorporated treatment objectives into penal drug law, will shift the debate over drug abuse policy toward greater consideration of public health goals.
一项重要的州药物滥用倡议,即加利福尼亚州2000年的第36号提案,规定对因持有毒品而被定罪的成年人应提供治疗而非监禁。虽然该法律扩大了对被捕者的公共治疗,但各县在构建其护理系统和管理客户的程序方面拥有自由裁量权。本文利用对八个县关键信息提供者的研究数据,考察了当地为增加药物治疗能力和管理客户获得治疗机会所做的规划。在这两个规划领域,本文描述了各县的策略和关注点、它们采取不同方法的原因,以及这项将治疗目标明确纳入刑事毒品法的州倡议是否以及如何会使关于药物滥用政策的辩论转向更多地考虑公共卫生目标。