• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对累犯酒驾者强制要求参加戒酒互助会:政策问题。

Mandated AA attendance for recidivist drinking drivers: policy issues.

作者信息

Speiglman R

机构信息

Marin Institute for the Prevention of Alcohol and Other Drug Problems, San Rafael, California, USA.

出版信息

Addiction. 1997 Sep;92(9):1133-6.

PMID:9374010
Abstract

Mandates for recidivist drinking drivers to attend AA meetings raise concerns about whether AA referral practices could have an adverse impact on both alcohol problems and traffic safety, whether routine and unregulated referrals to AA may prove detrimental to AA as an organization, and over ethical issues and possible loss of civil liberties. Similar issues arise in criminal justice and other agencies' handling of a variety of situations beyond the DUI arena. As a result institutions mandating involvement in mutual aid programs such as AA, and a variety of treatment settings, should adopt cautious referral practices, support rigorous research and create and evaluate targeted programs and integrated services.

摘要

要求屡犯的酒后驾车者参加戒酒互助会引发了一些担忧,即戒酒互助会的转介做法是否会对酒精问题和交通安全产生不利影响,常规且无规范的转介给戒酒互助会这一组织是否可能有害,以及涉及伦理问题和公民自由可能丧失的问题。类似问题也出现在刑事司法和其他机构处理酒后驾车领域之外的各种情况时。因此,强制参与戒酒互助会等互助项目的机构以及各种治疗机构,应采取谨慎的转介做法,支持严谨的研究,并创建和评估有针对性的项目及综合服务。

相似文献

1
Mandated AA attendance for recidivist drinking drivers: policy issues.对累犯酒驾者强制要求参加戒酒互助会:政策问题。
Addiction. 1997 Sep;92(9):1133-6.
2
Mandated AA attendance for recidivist drinking drivers: ideology, organization, and California criminal justice practices.对屡犯酒后驾车者强制要求参加戒酒互助会:理念、组织及加利福尼亚州刑事司法实践
Addiction. 1994 Jul;89(7):859-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00989.x.
3
Identifying client-level indicators of recovery among DUI, criminal justice, and non-criminal justice treatment referrals.确定在醉酒驾驶、刑事司法及非刑事司法治疗转介案例中客户层面的康复指标。
Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43(12-13):1785-801. doi: 10.1080/10826080802297484.
4
Criminal and alcohol problems among Swedish drunk drivers--predictors of DUI relapse.瑞典酒驾者的犯罪及酒精问题——酒后驾车复发的预测因素
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;31(6):471-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.09.003. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
5
[Alcohol problems in drinking drivers and clinical management methods].
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2008 Apr;56(2):109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
6
An evaluation of the effectiveness of alcohol treatment, driver license actions and jail terms in reducing drunk driving recidivism in California.对加利福尼亚州酒精治疗、驾照措施和监禁刑期在减少酒后驾车累犯方面有效性的评估。
Addiction. 1997 Aug;92(8):989-97.
7
Effects of drivers' license suspension policies on alcohol-related crash involvement: long-term follow-up in forty-six states.驾照吊销政策对与酒精相关撞车事故参与情况的影响:46个州的长期随访
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Aug;31(8):1399-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00441.x. Epub 2007 Jun 9.
8
Is the drug court model exportable? The cost-effectiveness of a driving-under-the-influence court.毒品法庭模式可输出吗?酒驾法庭的成本效益。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006 Jul;31(1):75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.03.011.
9
Effects of legal BAC limits on fatal crash involvement: analyses of 28 states from 1976 through 2002.法定血液酒精浓度限制对致命撞车事故参与情况的影响:对1976年至2002年28个州的分析
J Safety Res. 2007;38(5):493-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Sep 29.
10
Alcohol in New Zealand road trauma.新西兰道路创伤中的酒精因素。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(4):183-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing Participation and Perceived Engagement Benefits in an Integrated Digital Behavioral Health Recovery Community for Women: A Cross-Sectional Survey.女性综合数字行为健康康复社区中参与情况及感知参与益处的特征分析:一项横断面调查
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Aug 26;6(8):e13352. doi: 10.2196/13352.
2
Comparison of 12-step groups to mutual help alternatives for AUD in a large, national study: Differences in membership characteristics and group participation, cohesion, and satisfaction.在一项大型全国性研究中,对酒精使用障碍(AUD)的12步团体与互助替代方案的比较:成员特征、团体参与度、凝聚力和满意度的差异
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Feb;73:16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
3
Twenty-one-year trends and correlates of pressure to change drinking.
饮酒习惯改变压力的 21 年变化趋势及相关因素
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 Apr;36(4):705-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01638.x. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
4
Incorporating a public health approach in drug law: lessons from local expansion of treatment capacity and access under California's Proposition 36.将公共卫生方法纳入毒品法律:加利福尼亚州第36号提案下扩大治疗能力与可及性的地方经验教训
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):723-57. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00329.x.
5
Do adolescents affiliate with 12-step groups? A multivariate process model of effects.青少年会加入十二步团体吗?一个关于影响的多变量过程模型。
J Stud Alcohol. 2002 May;63(3):293-304. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2002.63.293.