Jennens Ross R, de Boer Richard, Irving Louis, Ball David L, Rosenthal Mark A
Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia.
Chest. 2004 Dec;126(6):1985-93. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.6.1985.
To quantify clinician knowledge and bias regarding the role of chemotherapy for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 16-question, multiple-choice questionnaire was sent to all Australian general internists, pulmonary and palliative care physicians, medical and radiation oncologists, and thoracic surgeons to assess beliefs concerning the role of chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. An overall assessment of "pessimism" and "optimism" regarding the role of chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC was made, and knowledge of specific outcome measures was evaluated.
A total of 1,325 questionnaires were mailed, with 679 replies (51%) received and 544 replies (41%) assessable. Overall, 60% of respondents were deemed to have good knowledge. There was a wide variation in knowledge between specialist groups (p < 0.0001), with more medical oncologists (76%) but fewer thoracic surgeons (35%) and general internists (50%) with good knowledge. Fewer medical oncologists (6%) were classified as pessimistic compared with palliative care physicians (31%), radiation oncologists (28%), or pulmonary physicians (22%). Sixty-eight percent of respondents agreed that most patients receiving chemotherapy have symptomatic improvement. More medical oncologists (77%) and pulmonary physicians (73%), but fewer general internists (55%) and palliative care physicians (57%) agreed with this. Medical oncologists were far more likely to agree that chemotherapy was of benefit in patients aged > or = 70 years compared with any of the other specialist groups.
There were significant differences regarding the perceived role of chemotherapy in metastatic disease between the various specialty groups involved in the treatment of NSCLC. Many clinicians had a poor understanding of contemporary data regarding the use of chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. This study raises substantial issues regarding the beliefs of clinicians treating NSCLC and emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary assessment.
量化临床医生对于化疗在IV期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗中作用的认识及偏差。
设计、研究地点与参与者:向所有澳大利亚普通内科医生、肺科及姑息治疗医生、医学肿瘤学家、放射肿瘤学家和胸外科医生发送了一份包含16个问题的多项选择题问卷,以评估他们对于化疗在转移性NSCLC中作用的看法。对化疗在转移性NSCLC中作用的“悲观”和“乐观”程度进行了总体评估,并评估了对特定结局指标的了解情况。
共邮寄了1325份问卷,收到679份回复(51%),其中544份回复(41%)可用于评估。总体而言,60%的受访者被认为具备良好的知识水平。各专科组之间的知识水平存在很大差异(p < 0.0001),具备良好知识水平的医学肿瘤学家更多(76%),而胸外科医生(35%)和普通内科医生(50%)较少。与姑息治疗医生(31%)、放射肿瘤学家(28%)或肺科医生(22%)相比,被归类为悲观的医学肿瘤学家较少(6%)。68%的受访者同意大多数接受化疗的患者症状会有所改善。更多的医学肿瘤学家(77%)和肺科医生(73%)同意这一点,而普通内科医生(55%)和姑息治疗医生(57%)同意的较少。与其他任何专科组相比,医学肿瘤学家更有可能同意化疗对年龄≥70岁的患者有益。
参与NSCLC治疗的不同专科组对化疗在转移性疾病中作用的认知存在显著差异。许多临床医生对化疗在转移性NSCLC中应用的当代数据理解不足。本研究提出了关于NSCLC治疗临床医生观念的重大问题,并强调了多学科评估的重要性。