Suppr超能文献

灾难化思维:术后疼痛的一个风险因素。

Catastrophizing: a risk factor for postsurgical pain.

作者信息

Pavlin D Janet, Sullivan Michael J L, Freund Peter R, Roesen Kristine

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2005 Jan-Feb;21(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200501000-00010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This research was designed to test the hypothesis that presurgery "catastrophizing" would predict postsurgical pain and postsurgical analgesic consumption.

METHODS

A sample of 48 individuals who underwent anterior cruciate ligament repair participated in the study. All participants completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (described by Sullivan et al in 1995) prior to surgery. Measures of pain (pain scores on a scale of 0-10) were obtained in the postanesthetic care unit, as well as 1, 2, and 7 days after surgery. Opioid and nonopioid analgesic consumption was tabulated while patients were in the hospital and after discharge.

RESULTS

Results showed that the Pain Catastrophizing Scale was a significant predictor of acute postsurgical pain in the postanesthetic care unit (r = 0.48, P = 0.004 for maximum pain in the postanesthetic care unit). Maximum pain ratings in patients with high Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores (> median of 13) were 33% to 74% higher numerically than in patients with low Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores (< or = median), and the duration of moderate-severe pain (>3/10) was more prolonged (45 minutes versus 28 minutes in patients with high and low Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores, respectively; P < 0.05). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale was also predictive of pain with activity at 24 hours (r = 0.65 for pain on walking, P < or = 0.0001). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale did not predict postoperative analgesic use.

CONCLUSION

The pattern of findings suggests that high catastrophizing scores may be a risk factor for heightened pain following surgery. Clinical and theoretical implications of the findings are addressed.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证术前“灾难化思维”可预测术后疼痛及术后镇痛药物用量这一假设。

方法

选取48例行前交叉韧带修复术的患者作为研究样本。所有参与者在手术前均完成了疼痛灾难化量表(由沙利文等人于1995年描述)。在麻醉后护理单元以及术后1天、2天和7天获取疼痛测量值(采用0至10分制的疼痛评分)。统计患者住院期间及出院后阿片类和非阿片类镇痛药物的用量。

结果

结果显示,疼痛灾难化量表是麻醉后护理单元急性术后疼痛的显著预测指标(麻醉后护理单元最大疼痛程度的相关系数r = 0.48,P = 0.004)。疼痛灾难化量表得分高(>中位数13分)的患者最大疼痛评分在数值上比得分低(≤中位数)的患者高33%至74%,且中重度疼痛(>3/10)的持续时间更长(疼痛灾难化量表得分高和低的患者分别为45分钟和28分钟;P < 0.05)。疼痛灾难化量表还可预测术后24小时活动时的疼痛(行走时疼痛的相关系数r = 0.65,P≤0.0001)。疼痛灾难化量表无法预测术后镇痛药物的使用情况。

结论

研究结果表明,高灾难化得分可能是术后疼痛加剧的一个风险因素。文中探讨了该研究结果的临床及理论意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验