Shepard Donald S, Reif Sharon
Schneider Institute for Health Policy, Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2004;39(13-14):2581-609. doi: 10.1081/ja-200034732.
Vocational rehabilitation (VR) programs within addiction treatment traditionally consider employment as the desired outcome. This singular focus ignores other benefits, such as.reduced substance use. A framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of VR within addiction treatment is presented and illustrated with data from the Alcohol and Drug Services Study (ADSS, 1996--1999). VR was associated with a 2.5% increase in probability of abstinence at an $883 increase in cost per admission. Thus, the estimated cost-effectiveness of VR in promoting abstinence is $35,000 per additional abstinent client ($883/0.025), indicating that VR is a cost-effective contributor to other goals of addiction treatment.
传统上,成瘾治疗中的职业康复(VR)项目将就业视为预期结果。这种单一的关注点忽视了其他益处,比如减少物质使用。本文提出了一个评估成瘾治疗中VR成本效益的框架,并用酒精和药物服务研究(ADSS,1996 - 1999年)的数据进行了说明。VR与戒酒概率增加2.5%相关,每次入院成本增加883美元。因此,VR在促进戒酒方面的估计成本效益为每增加一名戒酒客户35,000美元(883美元/0.025),这表明VR是成瘾治疗其他目标的成本效益贡献因素。