Hands L J, Jones R W, Clarke M, Mahaffey W, Bangs I
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10 Suppl 1:38-40. doi: 10.1258/1357633042614212.
We have performed a feasibility study of telemedicine as an alternative to conventional outpatient appointments for the making of diagnostic and management decisions for patients referred for vascular surgery. Twenty-two sequential patients referred by a single general practice to a vascular centre were offered a telemedicine clinic appointment as an alternative to a conventional hospital outpatient appointment. A referral pro forma and digital photograph (where appropriate) were transmitted in advance of the videoconference. The videoconference involved patient, practice nurse and vascular consultant. All patients opted for the teleconsultation. The majority had leg ulceration or leg pain. Six patients required only the initial teleconsultation and were managed thereafter in the community. Thirteen were referred to the vascular laboratory for investigation. Three proceeded to angioplasty and four to surgery. Two patients had a conventional outpatient appointment for follow-up but all others were followed up via telemedicine. Overall 27 conventional outpatient appointments were replaced by a teleconsultation.
我们开展了一项远程医疗可行性研究,将其作为传统门诊预约的替代方式,用于为血管外科转诊患者做出诊断和管理决策。由单一全科诊所转诊至血管中心的22例连续患者,被提供了远程医疗门诊预约,作为传统医院门诊预约的替代选择。转诊表格和数码照片(如适用)在视频会议前提前传送。视频会议涉及患者、执业护士和血管外科顾问。所有患者都选择了远程会诊。大多数患者有腿部溃疡或腿痛。6例患者仅需首次远程会诊,此后在社区接受管理。13例被转诊至血管实验室进行检查。3例接受了血管成形术,4例接受了手术。2例患者进行了传统门诊预约以进行随访,但其他所有患者均通过远程医疗进行随访。总体而言,27次传统门诊预约被远程会诊所取代。