Suppr超能文献

《诊断性访谈表》中的效度问题。

Issues of validity in the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

作者信息

Malgady R G, Rogler L H, Tryon W W

机构信息

Program in Quantitative Studies, New York University, Bronx, NY 10458.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 1992 Jan;26(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(92)90016-h.

Abstract

The Diagnostic Interview Schedule, the chief instrument in contemporary studies in psychiatric epidemiology, enhances the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis and enables lay interviewers to closely reproduce psychiatric interviews. However, despite frequent references in the literature to the validity of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, most studies fundamentally represent variations of reliability paradigms to the neglect of criterion-related validity. Mistaken assertions of validity persist in the psychometric language used to describe the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. This article examines the basis for claims and counterclaims of validity in accordance with standard psychometric definition, and identifies sources of erroneous reasoning in attempts to infer validity from reliability. The article presents a general framework organizing the process of diagnostic validation and discusses strategies for research seeking to validate psychiatric diagnoses achieved through the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

摘要

《诊断访谈表》是当代精神疾病流行病学研究中的主要工具,它提高了精神疾病诊断的可靠性,并使非专业访谈者能够近乎原样地重复精神科访谈。然而,尽管文献中频繁提及《诊断访谈表》的效度,但大多数研究从根本上来说都是可靠性范式的变体,而忽视了与标准相关的效度。在用于描述《诊断访谈表》的心理测量语言中,仍然存在对效度的错误断言。本文根据标准心理测量定义审视了效度主张与反主张的依据,并识别了试图从可靠性推断效度时的错误推理来源。本文提出了一个组织诊断验证过程的总体框架,并讨论了旨在验证通过《诊断访谈表》得出的精神疾病诊断的研究策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验