Suppr超能文献

精神疾病分类的演变

The Evolution of the Classification of Psychiatric Disorders.

作者信息

Surís Alina, Holliday Ryan, North Carol S

机构信息

Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, 4500 S. Lancaster Road, Dallas, TX 75216, USA.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2016 Jan 18;6(1):5. doi: 10.3390/bs6010005.

Abstract

This article traces the history of classification systems for mental illness and then reviews the history of the American diagnostic system for mental disorders. The steps leading up to each publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) are described including leaders, timelines, pre-publication meetings, and field trials. Important changes in the purpose of the manuals are described with a focus on events leading to the manual's third edition (DSM-III), which represented a paradigm shift in how we think about, and use, the classification system for mental illness. For the first time, DSM-III emphasized empirically-based, atheoretical and agnostic diagnostic criteria. New criticisms of the DSM-III and subsequent editions have arisen with a call for a new paradigm shift to replace diagnostic categories with continuous dimensional systems of classification, returning to etiologically-based definitions and incorporating findings from neurobiological science into systems of diagnosis. In the foreseeable future, however, psychiatric diagnosis must continue to be accomplished by taking a history and assessing the currently established criteria. This is necessary for communication about diseases and education of clinicians and scientists in medical fields, as well as advancement of research needed to further advance the diagnostic criteria of psychiatry.

摘要

本文追溯了精神疾病分类系统的历史,然后回顾了美国精神障碍诊断系统的历史。描述了《诊断与统计手册》(DSM)每次出版之前的步骤,包括负责人、时间线、出版前会议和现场试验。阐述了手册目的的重要变化,重点是导致手册第三版(DSM-III)的事件,该版代表了我们对精神疾病分类系统的思考和使用方式的范式转变。DSM-III首次强调基于实证、无理论和不可知论的诊断标准。对DSM-III及其后续版本出现了新的批评,呼吁进行新的范式转变,用连续维度分类系统取代诊断类别,回归基于病因的定义,并将神经生物学科学的研究结果纳入诊断系统。然而,在可预见的未来,精神科诊断仍必须通过采集病史并评估当前既定标准来完成。这对于疾病交流、医学领域临床医生和科学家的教育以及推进进一步完善精神病学诊断标准所需的研究而言是必要的。

相似文献

1
The Evolution of the Classification of Psychiatric Disorders.精神疾病分类的演变
Behav Sci (Basel). 2016 Jan 18;6(1):5. doi: 10.3390/bs6010005.

引用本文的文献

3
Extracting interpretable signatures of whole-brain dynamics through systematic comparison.通过系统比较提取全脑动力学的可解释特征。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Dec 23;20(12):e1012692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012692. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Reimagining psychoses: an agnostic approach to diagnosis.重新构想精神病:一种对诊断的不可知论方法。
Schizophr Res. 2013 May;146(1-3):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.02.022. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
7
Standards for DSM-5 reliability.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版可靠性标准。
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 May;169(5):537; author reply 537-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010083.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验