Suppr超能文献

评估计算机化用药史的准确性。

Assessing the accuracy of computerized medication histories.

作者信息

Kaboli Peter J, McClimon Brad J, Hoth Angela B, Barnett Mitchell J

机构信息

Center for Research in the Implementation of Innovative Strategies in Practice at the Iowa City VA Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 2):872-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of computerized medication histories.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study sample included 493 Department of Veterans Affairs primary care patients aged 65 years or older who were receiving at least 5 prescriptions. A semistructured interview confirmed medication, allergy, and adverse drug reaction (ADR) histories. Accuracy of the computerized medication lists was assessed, including omissions (medications not on the computer record) and commissions (medications on the computer record that were no longer being taken). Allergy and ADR records also were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients were taking a mean of 12.4 medications: 65% prescription, 23% over-the-counter products, and 12% vitamins/herbals. There was complete agreement between the computer medication list and what the patient was taking for only 5.3% of patients. There were 3.1 drug omissions per patient, and 25% of the total number of medications taken by patients were omitted from the electronic medical record. There were 1.3 commissions per patient, and the patients were not taking 12.6% of all active medications on the computer profile. In addition, 23.2% of allergies and 63.9% of ADRs were not in the computerized record.

CONCLUSIONS

Very few computerized medication histories were accurate. Inaccurate medication information may compromise patient care and limit the utility of medication databases for research and for assessment of the quality of prescribing and disease management.

摘要

目的

确定计算机化用药史的准确性。

研究设计

横断面观察性研究。

患者与方法

研究样本包括493名年龄在65岁及以上、正在接受至少5种处方药物治疗的退伍军人事务部初级保健患者。通过半结构化访谈确认用药、过敏和药物不良反应(ADR)史。评估计算机化用药清单的准确性,包括遗漏(计算机记录中未列出的药物)和错误录入(计算机记录中列出但已不再服用的药物)。同时也评估过敏和ADR记录。

结果

患者平均服用12.4种药物:65%为处方药,23%为非处方药,12%为维生素/草药。计算机用药清单与患者实际服用药物完全一致的患者仅占5.3%。每位患者平均有3.1种药物遗漏,患者服用的所有药物中有25%未录入电子病历。每位患者平均有1.3种错误录入药物,患者未服用计算机记录中所有有效药物的12.6%。此外,23.2%的过敏信息和63.9%的ADR信息未录入计算机记录。

结论

计算机化用药史准确的情况极少。不准确的用药信息可能会影响患者护理,并限制用药数据库在研究以及评估处方质量和疾病管理方面的效用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验