Chen Shyh-Chyan, Hsieh Cheng-Hsing, Hsu Geng-Long, Wang Chii-Jye, Wen Hsien-Sheng, Ling Pei-Ying, Huang Hsiu-Mei, Tseng Guo-Fang
Microsurgical Potency Reconstruction and Research Center, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, 424 Pa-Te Road, Sec 2, Taipei 105, Taiwan, ROC.
J Androl. 2005 Jan-Feb;26(1):53-60.
Our aim was to study retrospectively the destiny of the deep dorsal vein of the penis in the event of its stripping surgery or its simple ligation in patients diagnosed with venoocclusive dysfunction 17 years ago. From June 1986 to May 1987, a total of 31 men were seen for erectile dysfunction due to venous leakage resulting from priapism, aging, or congenital or idiopathic factors. Of these, 23 men underwent venous stripping of the deep dorsal vein and are referred to as the stripping group. The remaining 8 patients received a simple ligation of the deep dorsal vein and are classified as the ligation group. A total of 21 patients (16 of the 23 and 5 out of the 8) were available for follow-up by using the abridged 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scoring system and cavernosograms. In the ligation group, the imaging demonstrates some compensatory veins that are commensurate with impotence postoperatively. In the stripping group, however, the follow-up cavernosograms disclosed no venous recurrence, but residual ones that were not crucial to the rigidity. The IIEF-5 scoring in the ligation group changed from a preoperative mean IIEF-5 score of 10.0 +/- 4.5 to 9.8 +/- 3.6 postoperatively. In the stripping group, however, the mean preoperative IIEF-5 score of 9.8 +/- 4.1 increased to a mean postoperative IIEF-5 score of 18.9 +/- 2.1. Although there was no significant difference between the 2 groups' preoperative IIEF-5 score, there was a statistically significant difference between treatments (P <.001). The penile venous vasculature bears no evidence of regeneration even as long as 17 years after their removal. This finding is in contrast to what is commonly believed, that erectile dysfunction will recur about 2 years after ligation of the deep dorsal vein. We therefore believe that the clinical recurrence may not be due to venous regeneration, and penile venous surgery, if properly performed, may be durable, although larger studies will be required.
我们的目的是回顾性研究17年前被诊断为静脉闭塞功能障碍的患者在进行阴茎背深静脉剥脱术或单纯结扎术后其命运如何。从1986年6月至1987年5月,共有31名男性因阴茎异常勃起、衰老、先天性或特发性因素导致静脉漏而出现勃起功能障碍前来就诊。其中,23名男性接受了阴茎背深静脉剥脱术,被称为剥脱组。其余8名患者接受了阴茎背深静脉单纯结扎术,被归类为结扎组。共有21名患者(23名中的16名和8名中的5名)通过使用国际勃起功能指数(IIEF - 5)评分系统的简化5项版本和海绵体造影进行了随访。在结扎组中,影像学显示一些与术后阳痿相称的代偿静脉。然而,在剥脱组中,随访海绵体造影未发现静脉复发,但有一些对硬度无关键影响的残留静脉。结扎组的IIEF - 5评分从术前平均IIEF - 5评分10.0±4.5变为术后9.8±3.6。然而,在剥脱组中,术前平均IIEF - 5评分9.8±4.1增加到术后平均IIEF - 5评分18.9±2.1。虽然两组术前IIEF - 5评分无显著差异,但治疗之间存在统计学显著差异(P <.001)。即使在阴茎静脉血管被移除长达17年后,也没有再生的迹象。这一发现与通常认为的阴茎背深静脉结扎术后约2年勃起功能障碍会复发的观点相反。因此,我们认为临床复发可能不是由于静脉再生,并且如果操作得当,阴茎静脉手术可能是持久的,尽管还需要更大规模的研究。