• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[经临床路径对经尿道前列腺切除术住院情况的问卷调查]

[A questionnaire survey for TURP hospitalization by clinical path].

作者信息

Okamura Kikuo, Ozawa Hideo, Kinukawa Tsuneo, Imamura Masaaki, Saito Shiro, Terai Akihito, Takei Mineo, Hasegawa Tomonori

机构信息

Department of Urology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology.

出版信息

Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2004 Nov;95(7):800-8. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.95.800.

DOI:10.5980/jpnjurol1989.95.800
PMID:15624490
Abstract

PURPOSE

We conducted a questionnaire survey to elucidate the rating of the patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and were managed by a common clinical path during hospitalization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

At the day of discharge from seven hospitals in Japan, the questionnaires were handed to 298 patients who underwent TURP in 2002. In the path, it was determined that the patients should be admitted one day before surgery and discharged on the seventh postoperative day.

RESULTS

The questionnaires were returned by 240 (80.5%) patients. Of the 212 patients answering a question regarding the desirable preoperative hospital stay, 58 (27.4%), 85 (40.1%) and 46 (21.7%) considered 1, 2 and 3 days as a desirable preoperative stay, respectively. Of the 206 answering a question about the desirable postoperative hospital stay, 54 (26.2%), 28 (13.6%) and 60 (29.1%) considered 7, 8 and 9-10 days as a desirable postoperative hospital stay, respectively. Of the 240 patients, 229 (95.4%) received the path for the patients, 234 (97.5%) understood the treatment methods well and 229 (95.4%) understood the schedule during hospitalization well. Two hundred thirty-six (98.3%) and 218 (90.8%) patients answered that as scheduled, they started to have meals and started to walk, respectively. Continuous drip infusion was terminated in 219 (91.3%) as scheduled, and indwelling catheters were removed in 215 (89.6%) as scheduled.

CONCLUSIONS

This questionnaire survey elucidated that approximately 70% of the patients who underwent TURP wanted to stay 1 or 2 days before surgery and 7 to 10 days after surgery. We consider it very important that patients understand well the treatment methods, complications, schedules during hospitalization and criteria for discharge when they are managed using the clinical path, so they will accept better a length of hospital stay that is shorter than that which they had desired.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项问卷调查,以阐明接受经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)并在住院期间按照常规临床路径管理的患者的评分情况。

患者与方法

在日本七家医院出院当天,向2002年接受TURP的298名患者发放问卷。按照该临床路径,患者应在手术前一天入院,并在术后第七天出院。

结果

240名(80.5%)患者返回了问卷。在回答关于理想术前住院时间问题的212名患者中,分别有58名(27.4%)、85名(40.1%)和46名(21.7%)认为理想的术前住院时间为1天、2天和3天。在回答关于理想术后住院时间问题的206名患者中,分别有54名(26.2%)、28名(13.6%)和60名(29.1%)认为理想的术后住院时间为7天、8天和9 - 10天。在240名患者中,229名(95.4%)接受了针对患者的临床路径,234名(97.5%)对治疗方法理解良好,229名(95.4%)对住院期间的日程安排理解良好。236名(98.3%)和218名(90.8%)患者分别回答说他们按计划开始进食和开始行走。219名(91.3%)患者按计划终止了持续滴注,215名(89.6%)患者按计划拔除了留置导尿管。

结论

这项问卷调查表明,接受TURP的患者中约70%希望在手术前住院1或2天,术后住院7至10天。我们认为,当使用临床路径管理患者时,让患者充分理解治疗方法、并发症、住院期间的日程安排和出院标准非常重要,这样他们会更好地接受比他们期望的住院时间更短的情况。

相似文献

1
[A questionnaire survey for TURP hospitalization by clinical path].[经临床路径对经尿道前列腺切除术住院情况的问卷调查]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2004 Nov;95(7):800-8. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.95.800.
2
[Implementation of a common clinical path for transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) in multiple hospitals].[多家医院经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)通用临床路径的实施]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2004 Nov;95(7):792-9. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.95.792.
3
[Questionnaire survey of peri-operative management of transurethral prostate resection in Japan].[日本经尿道前列腺切除术围手术期管理的问卷调查]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2006 Nov;97(7):830-4. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.97.830.
4
[Evolution of common clinical path for transurethral resection of prostate (TURP)].[经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)常见临床路径的演变]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2007 Jan;98(1):3-8. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.98.3.
5
Combined cystolithotomy and transurethral resection of prostate: best management of infravesical obstruction and massive or multiple bladder stones.膀胱结石切开取石术联合经尿道前列腺切除术:膀胱颈梗阻及巨大或多发膀胱结石的最佳治疗方法
Urology. 2002 May;59(5):688-91. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01507-8.
6
Perioperative management of transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a nationwide survey in Japan.日本良性前列腺增生经尿道手术的围手术期管理:一项全国性调查
Int J Urol. 2011 Apr;18(4):304-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02712.x. Epub 2011 Jan 30.
7
Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications.双极经尿道前列腺切除术与标准经尿道前列腺切除术的比较:住院时间更短、导尿管拔除更早且并发症更少。
BJU Int. 2005 Jan;95(1):69-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05253.x.
8
[Comparative observation of thulium laser resection of the prostate-tangerine technique and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia of various sizes].[铥激光前列腺切除术-橘子技术与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗不同大小良性前列腺增生的对比观察]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 12;99(6):423-427. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.06.008.
9
Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: is it any better than standard transurethral prostatectomy? 5-year follow-up.经尿道前列腺电汽化术:它比标准经尿道前列腺切除术更好吗?5年随访
J Endourol. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(1):79-82. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.79.
10
Efficacy and safety of prostate artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: an observational study and propensity-matched comparison with transurethral resection of the prostate (the UK-ROPE study).前列腺动脉栓塞治疗良性前列腺增生症的疗效和安全性:一项观察性研究及与经尿道前列腺切除术的倾向评分匹配比较(英国-ROPE 研究)。
BJU Int. 2018 Aug;122(2):270-282. doi: 10.1111/bju.14249. Epub 2018 May 6.